Redaction Criticism
- Created by: rmcguinness2910
- Created on: 06-12-16 11:44
Aims
'Redact' means to edit/revise
Examines how gospel writer edited his sources and why
Like editorial work, we must ask why Luke excluded and included what he did
R. critics suggest gospel writers were more creative than form critics gave them credit for
Concerned with: Choice material, Order, Alterations, Ommisions, Changes setting, Use Christological titles
Claim gospel writers had own purpose and each gospel had its own unique indentity
Relying on 4 source theory, Matthew and Luke used Mark, both used Q and different in places, Special L and M.
The Author
R. criticism less about what gospels tell us about Jesus and more about author and their perspective
After discovering editorial or redactional work it is the job on the r. critic to see what reasons were behind the changes
Ex. Luke omits Greek Woman's Daughter as he didn't want to refer to gentiles as 'dogs'
Luke emphasis on prayer has Jesus praying at Transfuiguration and before his Baptism. This isn't mentioned in Mark
Matthew refers to "poor in spirit" but Luke refers to the "poor". This shows greater concern for the poor.
Many of the 14 parables unique to Luke emphasize Jesus mission to the lost and the outcast
Conzelmann Redaction Critic for Luke
1954- Conzelmann presented a study of Luke's theology, isolating the major emphases of Luke. Ex. Interest in Jerusalem as the centre of activity.
He identified a 3 stage salvation history in Luke and Acts;
1. The Time of Israel
2. Jesus' Ministry
3. Work of the Christian Church
This is regarded as Luke's main theology as Luke viewed history as the story of God and his purpose was the salvation of men.
First Era
Time of Law and Prophets
Ends with John the Baptist
Luke we hear: "The law and the prophets were proclaimed unitl John"
John is its climax, states "I baptise you with water. But one more powerful than I will come"
Luke follows Mark pattern and order closely for most part. But keeps ministries of John and Jesus distinct as they belong to different eras
John is excluded from Baptism of Jesus as this is start of Jesus' ministry
Luke tells us Herod had John locked up in prison before Jesus' Baptism.
Second Era
Time of Jesus' minsitry
Ends with Jesus Ascension into heaven
Conzelmann believes period of Jesus is Satan free. Satan left Jesus after his temptation and returned to enter Judas to betray Jesus.
Luke's presentation of salvation history seen in Jesus bringing salvation to all
Jesus stated at beginning of his ministry "because he has anointed me to preach good news to the poor"
Shows women as prominent, by bringing them salvation
Mary is model of discipleship and faith
Jesus said to woman with haemorrhage "your faith has made you well".
Third Era
Time of church
Begins with Holy Spirit at Pentecost
Contiues until time of Parousia
Luke didn't believe Jesus brougt an end to history so he writes the Acts of the Apostles. He sees time of the church as the third era in God's plan and not as a waiting period.
Luke wants to end one era before starting another. John is arrested before Jesus begins his ministry, and Jesus has ascended into heaven before the coming of the Holy Spirit.
Delay of the Parousia
Luke's 3 stage salvation history may have developed from early church dilemma as to why Jesus hadn't returned
Mark says the kingdom of God is at hand, and this is omitted by Luke
Luke says disciples must take up their cross daily and the son of man will come but not in this "adulterous and sinful generation".
Both Matthew and Mark refer to Jesus coming on the clouds of heaven but Luke does NOT as he wants to avoid the idea of an imminent paraousia.
Luke makes it clear in his gospel that the church has a task to do before the second coming, and it's all part of God's salvation plan.
Relationship between Christians and the Roman Empi
Realisation that the end of history was no longer near meant that Christians and Romans would have to live side by side for quite some time.
So Luke continously presents Roman authority as sympathetic to Chistianity, e.g. Pilate finds no fault with Jesus on 3 occasions.
"I find no basis for a charge against this man"
... "I have found no grounds for the death penalty"
If Pilate publicly declares Jesus to be innocent, and only condemns his due to pressure form Jewish authorities, then Rome and its leaders should recognise how the church founded on jesus can't be a threat to them.
Symbolism
Conzelmann argues georgraphy in Luke was symbolic, ex. mountain is the place of prayer
He leaves it out in the temptation and changes the Sermon on the Mount to the Sermon on the Plain.
Conclusion
Author's theological outlook seen as the framework of the gospel
Scholar Stein says "'scissors' of form criticism were manipulated by a theological hand, and the 'paste' was impregnated with a particular theology"
Related discussions on The Student Room
- CCEA Religious Studies. GCSE and A-Level thread »
- NHS statistics as sources for psychology dissertation? »
- Withdrawn from course without warning? »
- would a masters in Law in Oxbridge more appealing to top law firms »
- Civil service paralegal »
- Child Care Grant »
- GDL before or after LLM / MA? »
- Will SFE fund my tuition fees. »
- Exeter University Gym »
- Exeter Rowancroft Court »
Comments
No comments have yet been made