Persuasion in the Legal Process

?

Defining Truth and Trust

Definitions:

  • Persuasion: an attempt in communication to convince others to do or believe something
  • Deception: persuasion by misleading, misinforming or misdirecting 
  • Lying: asserting a proposition that we do not believe 

Nature of Lying:

  • 3 elements of lying (Coleman and Kay 1981)
    • Factual falsity: 'the earth is flat' 
    • Falsity of belief: 'I know in fact, the earth is flat' 
    • Intention to decieve: 'I want you to believe the earth is flat'
  • Liar Paradox 
    • 'I am lying' 
    • Refers to what was just said, not what you are saying now
  • Plato's and Neitszche's cynical certainties 
    • Everything we know is a lie
    • How can we distinguish a truth from a lie? 
1 of 7

Sincerity

  • Speaker has a commitment to truthfulness

Grices Maxim of Quality:

  • Make your contribution one that is true 
  • Do not say what you believe to be false - sincerity 
  • Do not say that for which you lack adequate evidence - accuracy 
  • Truthfulness requires both sincerity and accuracy 

Sincerity and Accuracy:

  • Sincerity: sharing with your interlocutor what they have a right to know 
  • Accuracy: caring about getting things right 

Discourse strategies of insincerity:

  • WIthholding: keeping back salient truths 
  • Misleading: implicitly suggesting what you do not believe 
  • Lying: explicitly asserting what you do not believe 
2 of 7

Suspension of Truthfulness

We can suspend our commitment to truthfulness in some contexts:

  • Conventional 
    • Prescribed: fiction, comedy
    • Performed: irony, hyperbole, metaphor 
  • Consequential
    • Polite: save face of others eg false invitation
    • Protective: save others or oneself from harm eg murderer at the door 
    • Condonable: playful eg pranks 

Perjury: 

  • Legal determination of lying as criminally sanctionable 
  • Testimonial oath: 
    • Converts truth presumption into prescription: an oral contract that binds witnesses to truth of their words 
  • Bronston Case 
    • Inquisitorial system: truth is elicited
    • Adversarial system: truth is tested 
3 of 7

Trust and the Liar

  • Trust based on risk, leap of faith 
  • More we trust, less likely to worry about deception 
  • Presumption of Trust 
    • Have to trust the world will function normally 
    • Lying breaches trust between interlocutors: misleads the hearer
  • Contracts and Trust 
    • Default position: parties cannot be trusted to keep their word 
    • Contracts bind them legally to their word 
    • By blindly trusting a company, we take on all risks 
    • Companies invest no trust in the user 
    • Users are bound by the terms of the company
    • In companies best interest if user doesn't read terms 

Lying in Testimony: trust in the witness is assigned according to - 

- Percieved inherent trustworthiness 

- Percieved credibility of testimony 

4 of 7

Low Trust Defendant

  • Defendant contrasts to gentleman/expert:
    • Strong vested interest 
    • Statistically more likely to be lower class 
  • Archetypal context of distrust 
    • Cannot expect participants to be honest 
    • Lawyer bound by code of ethics that may clash with code to represent clients best interests 
  • Defendant testifying
    • Working class defendants suffer link between trust and class 
  • From Lie to Liar 
    • Stressing frequency of lying 
    • Collective lies 
    • Repetition 
    • Intensification 
    • Morality 
    • Capacity to lie 
    • Normality of lying 
5 of 7

Lying in Police Interrogation

  • Context of extreme institutional distrust 
  • Different rules
    • In US jurisdictions; distrust legitimates police lying to the suspect 
    • Suspects not allowed to lie and can be charged for false statement 
    • Suspect may trust interrogator as figure of authority
  • Deceptive techniques used in the US 
    • Lying 
    • Intimidation 
    • Silence
    • False sympathy 
    • False empathy 
    • Altering information 
    • Pointing out contradictions 
    • Bodily cues of deception 
    • Minimising the seriousness of the defendants actions 
    • Focussing on the futility of denial
6 of 7

Polygraph

  • Win-win testing 
    • If suspect fails, interrogator will lie and say this proves guilt 
    • If suspect passes, interrogator will lie and claim they failed
  • Vulnerable suspects will trust the interrogator and the technology 
    • Leads to false confessions 
    • Convinced of crimes they did not commit 
7 of 7

Comments

No comments have yet been made

Similar English Language resources:

See all English Language resources »See all Lying and the Legal Process resources »