Chomsky maintained that language structures can not be simply acquired by repeating language such as CDS, because of utterances being non-grammatical and incomplete. However, this now seems to be less valid, as studies of CDS features suggest that this register is more structured and regular than previously thought.
Chomsky has changed his idea over the years, although not from the core concept of childrens innate ability to learn language (nativism). His focus is useful to explain grammatical development, but you can see that it does not come all the way to explaining other aspects of language.
For
- +Experience some stages of development at the same pace
- +Resit correction
- +Overgeneralisations
- +Produce correct language when surrounded by 'impoverished' adult speech - false starts etc
Against
- -Need more input to give them other skills than grammar - Pragmatics
Comments
No comments have yet been made