INFLUENCE EARLY ATTACHMENT ON CHILDHOOD AND LATER RELATIONSHIPS 0.0 / 5 ? PsychologyAttachmentASAQA Created by: _Holly98Created on: 20-03-16 11:39 INTERNAL WORKING MODEL QUALITY CHILDS FIRST RELATIONSHIP CRUCIAL AFFECT NATURE FUTURE RELATIONSHIPS FIRST EXPERIENCE = LOVING - ASSUME THATS WHAT RELATIONSHIPS SHOULD BE SEEK FUNCTIONAL RELATIONSHIPS - NOT TOO UNINVOLVED, ATTACHED / CONTROLLING / ARGUMENTATIVE BAD EXPEREINCES = NOT BEHAVE APPROPRIATLEY IN THEM 1 of 9 RELATIONSHIPS IN LATER CHILDHOOD SECURLEY ATTACHED INFANTS - BEST QUALITY FRIENDSHIPS. INSECURE RESISTATNT STRUGGLE - KERNS 1994 BULLYING PREDICTED ATTACHMENT TYPE MYRON-WILSON & SMITH ASSESED ATTACHMENT TYPE AND BULLYING - STANDARD QUESTIONNAIRE 196 KIDS AGED 9 - 11 INSECURE AVOIDANT = MOST LIEKLY VICTIMS. INSECURE RESISTANT = LESS LIKELY VICTIM 2 of 9 RELATIONSHIP ROMANTIC PARTNER MCCARTHY STUDIED 40 WOMEN ASSESS INFANTS ESTABLISH ATTACHMENT TYPE SECURELY BEST RELATIONSHIPS INSECURE RESISTANT INFANTS PROBLEM MANTAINING INSECURE-AVOIDANT STRUGGLED INTIMACY HAZAN & SHAVER STUDY 3 of 9 PROCEDURES ANALYSED 620 REPLIES LOVE QUIZ AMERICAN NEWSPAPER - 3 SECTIONS 1 - ASSESSED RESPONDANTS CURRENT RELATIONSHIP 2 - GENERAL LOVE EXPERIENCES E.G. NO. PARTNERS 3 - ATTACHMENT YPE ASKING CHOSE THREE STATEMENTS DESCRIBE FEELINGS 4 of 9 FINDINGS 56% - SECURLEY ATTACHED 25% - INSECURE AVOIDANT 19% - INSECURE RESISTANT SECURE LONG RELATIONSHIPS AVOIDANT / RESISTANT REVEAL JEALOUSY FEAR INTIMACY PATTERN ATTACHMENT REFLECT ROMANTIC RELATIONSHIPS 5 of 9 RELATIONSHIPS ADULTHOOD AS PARENT INTERNAL WORKING MODEL AFFECT CHILDS ABILITY PARENT BASE STYLE INTERNAL WORKING MODEL ATTACHMENT TYPE INHERITED BAILEY 90 MOTHERS ATTACHMENT WITH BABIES AND THEIR MOTHERS - STRANGE SITUATION & INTERVIEW MAJORITY SAME ATTACHMENT AS CHILDREN 6 of 9 EVALUATION: EVIDENCE CONTINUITY ATTACHMENT TYPE IS INTERNAL WORKING MODEL PREDICTS SECURITY ATTACHMENT AND LATER RELATIONSHIPS MCCARTHY APPEAR SUPPORT INTERNAL WORKING MODEL ZIMMERMAN ASSESSED REALTIONSHIP QUALITY ATTACHMENT PARENTS NOT EXPECTER IF INTERNAL WORKING MODELS IMPORTANT DEVELOPMENT 7 of 9 EVALUATION: VALIDITY ISSUES MOST STUDIES DONT USE STRANGE SITUATION - USE QUESTIONARRE SELF REPORT TECHNIQUES - DEPEND HONESTY RELATED PROBLEM CONCERNS RESTROSPECTIVE NATURE ASSESSMENT INFANT ATTACHMENTS LOOKING BACK LACKS VALIDITY - RELIES ACCURATE RECOLLECTIONS 8 of 9 ASSOCIATION DOES NOT MEAN CASUALTY STUDIES INFANT ATTACHENT ASSOCIATED QUALITY LATER RELATIONSHIPS ALTERNATIVE EXPLANATIONS CONTINUITY THIRD ENVIORNMENTAL FACTOR E.G. PARENT STYLES CHILDS TEMPERMANET INFLUENCE LIMIATION - COUNTER BOWLY VIEW INERNAL WORKING MODEL CAUSED OUTCOMES 9 of 9
Comments
No comments have yet been made