this is the strongest argument against Mill
In his book 'parliamentary reform' mill seems to be arguing in favour of TOM
he claims in this book that educated people should be allowed more votes that those members of society who arent educated. This could lead to TOM and the involvement of selfish motivationsMill may arguue that the educated would choose what was best for society as a whole therefore benefitting society
this could be repression of the lower classes as education isnt necessary to have common sense
Under pluralistic voting systems is paternalistic and would treat the citiizens like children
Mill argues this would develop the society in a positive way as they are lesser in number than the working class and it is simply evening it out
He is also inconsistant in the application chapter- Public decency and advertising
Comments
No comments have yet been made