Cosmological Argument

?

Plato

Only primary movers - souls - can affect change as only they can cause montion spontaneously therefore only such a soul could create the universe

Primary movers - an object with the power to move or change itself or others - souls

Secondary mover - objects which could only change or move others once they had been moved.

1 of 3

Aristotle

claim 1) there is an unmoved mover - a creator of the universe

claim 2) no such being

Attack on claim 2:

The chain of things happening has no beginning

nothing caused the first mover to move

if nothing started the chain then there is no chain

clearly things exist

unmoved mover - necessary.

Aristotle - the universe is eternal and the unmoved mover keeps it all in order.

2 of 3

The Kalam Argument

Everything with a beginning has a cause

the universe has a beginning

the universe must have a cause

William Craig adds another step: The cause must be personal as science cannot give a causal account (Swinburne)

God

  • not necessarily the case - due to set theory infinity is no longer contradictory
  • beginnings without cause appear in nature - quantum
  • If God needs no first cause then why does the universe
  • What is the cause of the first cause?
3 of 3

Comments

No comments have yet been made

Similar Philosophy resources:

See all Philosophy resources »See all Cosmological Argument resources »