- employed when the D has the AR and MR for the offence
- D believes the V's role in the act and their MR prevents there from being a crime
Burdern of Proof = lies with prosecution DEFENCE need to raise the defence Effective defence = full acquittal
Basic Rule for Consent = cannot onsent to anything above a battery unless it is one of legally recognised exceptions e.g horseplay (Brown)
Assisted suicide cannot be held as consent as it is illegal in the UK (Pretty v DPP)
Consent must be real and therefore the V must have full capictiy to consent which generaly means an adult who is able to understand the consequences of the actions (Burrell v Harmer and Gillick v West Norfolk AHA)
Collins & Willock: "generally speaking consent is only a defence to a battery; and most of the physical contacts of ordinary life are not actionable because they are impliedly consented to" - Lord Goff
V has to understand real nature of the act. 'Informed' is usually used here nd the V must know the nature and quality of the act they are consenting to (Tabassum)
V's cosent is good unless unless he does not know BOTH the nature and quality of the act (Olugbola and Dica) - transmitting diseases
Comments
No comments have yet been made