Implied consent-Wilson v Pringle- 'everyday jostlings'
The scope of consent as a defence
AG Ref (No 6 of 1980)- Consent will not be a defence to S47- not in public interest etc. Exceptions- Fighting (properly conducted games/sports), surgery, lawful correction, dangerous exhibitions.
Brown and others- Additional lawful activities- tattooing, piercing, male circumcision, violent sports.
Lawful activities
Barnes- a sports player implies consent. Only prosecute cases where conduct is serious enough to be called 'criminal', eg intending/reckless about causing injury, or causing injury outside the game rules.
Comments
No comments have yet been made