spoken language essay

?

spoken language essay

Similarities

  • J.R. and D.B. notes
  • Intro: Describes
  • Two television chat show interviews.
  • Consider: the main features of the David Beckham interview and how it contrasts with the Meg Ryan interview.
  • Intro to J.R. and D.B. interview.
  • General impressions: mostly positive, fun and light hearted.
  • rather then formal and orderly.
  • Relationship between interviewer and interviewee= behave like two friends having a laugh.
  • Body language= David Beckham leans back through most of the interview.
  • Interview style= informal.
  • Paragraph 1: questions asked= personal.
  • "posh spice."
  • Mood of this interview= very fun and light hearted.
  • Audiences reaction= really involved due to them laughing with David Beckham rather then at him.
  • Mae for very interesting T.V. viewing.
  • Paragraph 2: Speech habits= fillers.
  • Questions asked= awkward.
  • Interviewee= doesn't want to respond. Could be unsuitable for this interview.
  • " even on the last show" aimed at the audience who think it is very rude Jonathan can't even say on Jonathan Ross's last show on BBC 2.
  • Paragraph 3: 1 minute into the interview:
  • Focus= anecdote.
  • Hedge= uses this to soften the blow of the story.
  • Audiences reaction= J.R. looks at the audience because he wants them to care.
  • Halfway point: Even more personal questions.
  • " trying for a number four."
  • Feelings of the interviewee= awkward.
  • Turns it into a joke to stop Jonathan Ross asking more personal questions.
  • Paragraph 4:
  • Toward the end of the interview:
  • questions asked= far more serious. Focus on career and pressure.
  • Less humour.
  • Response of the interviewee= less responsive and less generous.
  • Audiences reaction= become quitter. Not laughing or contributing to anything Jonathan Ross says.
  • Overall conclusion of this interview: Interviewer and interviewee have a very comfortable relationship.
  • Gotten awkward= when J.R. was trying to get personal information from D.B. to get a good T.V. interview.
  • Succesful interview= Audience did feel they discovered personal information they had not known before.
  • Conversation has been very humorous.

Differences

  • M.R. and M.P. notes
  • Intro to M.R. and M.P. interview:
  • Atmosphere of the interview= far more serious and awkward.
  • Michael Parkinson's intentions= far more formal throughout than Jonathan Ross. personally challenging throughout.
  • Paragraph 1: Interview style= quite aggressive.
  • Michael Parkinson= very tough at this point.
  • Meg Ryan= not a very willing contributor to the interviewer.
  • Mood of Meg Ryan = sits back in her chair trying to turn away from Michael Parkinson.
  • Body language of Meg Ryan= Fiddles with her hair and with her neck.
  • Paragraph 2: Statements made: make Meg Ryan surprised.
  • Seems taken off guard.
  • Body language= Meg Ryan leans back in defense.
  • Mood of the interview= very serious due to Meg Ryan defending herself.
  • Audiences reaction= release tension and laughs at the interview rather then with it.
  • Paragraph 3: Towards the end of the interview:
  • Questions asked= mainly focus on journalism.
  • Mood of this interview= Parkinson makes multiple statements as Meg Ryan hesitates when he speaks to her.
  • Accusation= Behave like a judge at court.
  • Paragraph 4: end of the interview:
  • Michael Parkinson gives Meg Ryan the choice of what to do.
  • Audiences reaction= laughs partly in relief the uncomfortable interview is over.
  • Although interview was very short= seemed much longer.
  • Strange way to end the interview= Parkinson has given in.
  • Almost as if= he is saying to the audience look at her. How she's behaving. and look at me I'm in control.
  • Both Parkinson and Meg Ryan look silly.

Overall comparison

Comments

DenBlan

Report

With numerous online services available, finding the one that aligns with your needs can be challenging. The first step is to ensure the site is trustworthy and genuinely offers the help you seek, avoiding potential scammers. Reputable writing services understand the importance of earning customers' trust and go the extra mile to establish credibility.

Legitimate essay writing services will readily provide information about their experience in the market, the size of their writer pool, and the number of papers completed for the student community. To instill confidence, these services often display customer reviews and paper samples on their websites.

While organizations aim to present their best aspects in their descriptions, seeking external reviews can provide a more objective perspective. OmniPapers (this site) is a valuable resource, offering honest reviews of various essay writing services and providing impartial rankings to assist you in making an informed decision.