|
Advantages
- They are unbiased.
- More likely to consider personal struggles.
- Free of charge.
- 12 of them. More diverse/representive.
- Uninfluenced from outside. Can give publicly unpopular opinions but they wouldn’t know until after the trial.
- Jury equity - they aren’t bound by the law and make choices based on their morals.
- They don’t have to stay for long.
- Public confidence, keeps state power in check.
|
Disadvantages
- Can take time to gather.
- Hard in overly publicised cases.
- Not legally qualified.
- More formal/intimidating.
- Jury tampering.
- Jury themselves might be uncomfortable.
- Discriminatory bias.
- Media influence.
- Complex cases that non-professionals wouldn’t understand. (Fraud)
- High acquittal rates. (60% of cases get acquitted). Judge often the one to make that case. On paper weakness but in practice not.
- Perverse decisions - they go against the facts of the case.
- Secrecy, we don’t know how and why the jury reached their conclusion and ergo we don’t know if there was a bias.
- The internet. It’s illegal for jurors to look up information relating to the case.
|
Comments
No comments have yet been made