Primary Research
- Created by: R_S_E
- Created on: 22-06-14 13:30
View mindmap
- Types of primary sources I could use for primary research
- Interaction with experts i.e. professional historians
- Better things to do than answer a students emails
- More than one, keep emailing
- Could be biased to one view point (their own) and want to persuade me to it = lessens the credibility
- Get in contact with more than one and see if they agree, if they don't it will give me more balance
- Could email historians or look at things they have said previusly
- The author should have a good reputation e.g. if their works have been sited in other academic journals = credible
- The author will have had a vested interest not to lie or distort the evidence as they wouldn't have wanted to damage their reputation = credible
- They'll have expertise in the field e.g. a PhD in Ancient History = credible
- All information they give me should be accurate
- Can use them to answer precise questions which I cannot find elsewhere
- Better things to do than answer a students emails
- Online Questionnaires
- Possibility of leading questions which could decrease the validity of the response
- Get another person to check it prior to sending
- Response rate is likely to be low = not enough data to get a consistent effect = decreases reliability
- Send it to as many people as possible to increase the likelihood of getting a large response rate
- Sample to send it to might be quite ethnocentric / not generalisable to the entire population (e.g. just students of my college for instance) = decreases validity
- Try and send it to as many people as possible from a variety of different backgrounds e.g. students, teachers, historians
- Very difficult to write one of these to fit with my question for 'normal' people - could do one for academics?
- Collect a lot of different types of data e.g. quantitative and qualitative which will give both depth and ease of analysis
- With email they're easy to send out to a lot of people
- Possibility of leading questions which could decrease the validity of the response
- Historical Artefacts
- Probably wouldn't be able to get very close to them = I lack ability to percieve which decreases the credibility of my analysis
- Use pictures on the internet to zoom in and really try and study in depth - doesn't solve this issue completely however
- Works of ancient historians would have to be in translation for me so they may lose some of their meaning
- Use the translations used/mentioned by others to get the best ones - can't really get around the language barrier
- Statues, architecture, pottery, mosaics, weaponry, archaeological digs, quotes from ancient historians etc.
- I can try and analyse what they mean myself (I learn to do something) and then look at historians' analysis = lots of different interpretations to get a balanced view
- Gives direct insight into history, the artefacts cannot lie just our interpretation
- Get an idea of the time of Alexander itself - great for putting things in context
- Probably wouldn't be able to get very close to them = I lack ability to percieve which decreases the credibility of my analysis
- Interaction with experts i.e. professional historians
Comments
No comments have yet been made