Theories of Religion
- Created by: MegStevens01
- Created on: 28-02-18 13:48
View mindmap
- THEORIES OF RELIGION
- Functionalist
- They believe that societies most basic need is social solidarity and social order through value consensus- without it, individual selfishness would cause social disintergration
- Durkheim
- Sacred and Profane
- Durkheim believes that the key feature of religion is the distinction between these two things
- Religion involves practices and rituals in relation to the sacred, and these are collective
- This is essential for society as it is reaffirming their support for shared values and beliefs
- He believes that the things labelled as sacred are what evoke the powerful feelings in believers as they see it as a symbol of great power
- In this view, the most powerful things that can evoke these feelings is society itself, so when people are worshipping, they are worshipping society itself
- Criticisms of Durkheim
- There is no sharp division between the sacred and profane as some clans share the same totems (Worsley)
- Applies better to small-scale societies where there are usually only single religions
- His ideas cannot be applied to contemporary society a there is a fragmented collective conscience (Mestrovic)
- Criticisms of Durkheim
- In this view, the most powerful things that can evoke these feelings is society itself, so when people are worshipping, they are worshipping society itself
- He believes that the things labelled as sacred are what evoke the powerful feelings in believers as they see it as a symbol of great power
- This is essential for society as it is reaffirming their support for shared values and beliefs
- Religion involves practices and rituals in relation to the sacred, and these are collective
- Durkheim believes that the key feature of religion is the distinction between these two things
- Totemism
- In this view, the most powerful things that can evoke these feelings is society itself, so when people are worshipping, they are worshipping society itself
- Criticisms of Durkheim
- There is no sharp division between the sacred and profane as some clans share the same totems (Worsley)
- Applies better to small-scale societies where there are usually only single religions
- His ideas cannot be applied to contemporary society a there is a fragmented collective conscience (Mestrovic)
- Criticisms of Durkheim
- Durkheim also argued that 'higher forces' are mistakenly attributed to totems of Gods when they are really the influence of the collective over the individual
- Because of this, he studied the Arunta Clan and noted that the totem gave each member a sense of awe and belonging
- He believed the feelings of awe was actually a reflection of the power of the group, and so were technically worshipping the clan/society
- Because of this, he studied the Arunta Clan and noted that the totem gave each member a sense of awe and belonging
- In this view, the most powerful things that can evoke these feelings is society itself, so when people are worshipping, they are worshipping society itself
- Cognitive Functions
- Durkheim believes that in order to share out thoughts to gain VC, we must use the same categories as others, such as time space etc.
- He says that religion is the origin of these concepts and categories that we need for reasoning and understandingof the world
- Durkheim believes that in order to share out thoughts to gain VC, we must use the same categories as others, such as time space etc.
- Sacred and Profane
- Durkheim
- Malinowski
- Psychological Functions
- Malinowski agrees with Durkheim that religion promotes solidarity
- However, in his view, he believes religion does this by performing psychological functions for individuals which helps them cope with stress that would otherwise undermine social solidarity
- He identifies two types of situation in which religion performs this role
- Where the outcome is important but uncontrollable and thus uncertain
- To show this he contrasts Lagoon fishing (safe and certain) to ocean fishing (dangerous)
- This gives people a sense of control and confidence reinforcing social solidarity
- To show this he contrasts Lagoon fishing (safe and certain) to ocean fishing (dangerous)
- At times of life crisis
- Helps minimise disruption during times like puberty or death
- E.g. funerals reinforce social solidarity among the survivors while the idea of immortality that many religions hold provides comfort to the bereaved
- Helps minimise disruption during times like puberty or death
- Where the outcome is important but uncontrollable and thus uncertain
- He identifies two types of situation in which religion performs this role
- However, in his view, he believes religion does this by performing psychological functions for individuals which helps them cope with stress that would otherwise undermine social solidarity
- Malinowski agrees with Durkheim that religion promotes solidarity
- Psychological Functions
- Parsons
- Theory of Values and Meaning
- Parsons sees religion as helping individuals to cope with stress and unforeseen events and uncontrollable outcomes (like Malinowski)
- He identifies two other functions that religion performs in modern society
- Creates and legitimises societies central values by sacralising them
- E.g. in the USA, Protestantism has sacralised the core American values of meritocracy and individualism, promoting VC
- It is the primary source of meaning
- Gives answers to ultimate life questions, such as why the good suffer, enabling people to adjust to adverse events to maintain stability
- Intepretivists
- Berger
- Religion has lost its theodicy but provides a sacred canopy which relieves pressures that could break down social solidarity
- Berger
- Creates and legitimises societies central values by sacralising them
- He identifies two other functions that religion performs in modern society
- Parsons sees religion as helping individuals to cope with stress and unforeseen events and uncontrollable outcomes (like Malinowski)
- Theory of Values and Meaning
- Bellah
- Civil Religion
- Bellah argues that civil religion intergrates society in a way that Americans many churches and denominations cannot
- It is belief system that attaches sacred qualities o society itself, e.g. Americanism unifying America
- It binds together people from many different ethnic and cultural backgrounds
- It is belief system that attaches sacred qualities o society itself, e.g. Americanism unifying America
- A belief in God isn't always a requirement, as long as the beliefs perform the same function
- Is this really a religion if it is not based off beliefs in the supernatural?
- Bellah argues that civil religion intergrates society in a way that Americans many churches and denominations cannot
- Civil Religion
- Evaluation
- Ignores religion as a source of division and conflict, especially in complex modern societies where there is more than one religion, e.g. Northern Ireland
- Emphasizes the positive functions,neglecting negative aspects such as oppression of the poor and women
- Feminism
- They argue that religious beliefs function as a patriarchal ideology that legitimises femal subordination
- Evidence of patriarchy
- Religious Organisations - mainly male-dominated even though women often participate more
- e.g. Orthodox Judaism forbid women to become priests
- Armstrong sees this as evidence of women's marginalisation
- Woodhead - womens exclusion from priesthood shows the churches unease about women
- e.g. Orthodox Judaism forbid women to become priests
- Places of worship - often segregate women and seat them behind screens while men occupy sacred areas
- Laws and Customs - may give women fewer rights than men, e.g. how they dress/how many spouses they have
- Religious Organisations - mainly male-dominated even though women often participate more
- Evidence of patriarchy
- Evaluation
- Religion can actually empower women, e.g. women wearing the hijab is seen as oppressive in Western society when actually it can be liberating for them
- Watson - practices that appear oppressive may have other meanings
- Religious groups, such as Quakers, are committed to gender equality
- Women can actually use some rules in religion to gain more status
- They argue that religious beliefs function as a patriarchal ideology that legitimises femal subordination
- Feminism
- Marxists point out how religion can be dysfunctional for society
- Marxism
- There would be no need for religion if society was classless
- Marx
- Believes religion is an institution maintaining the capitalist rule by distorting peoples perception of reality to serve the needs of the capitalist society
- He believes the ruling class controls both economic production, but also the production and distribution of ideas in society
- Religion acts as an 'ideological weapon' for the RC to legitimise the suffering of the poor as something inevitable
- Religion therefore misleads the poor into thinking their suffering is needed to get into the afterlife which then prevents the poor from rebelling to change their situation
- Lenin describes religion as a 'spiritual gin' confusing the WC to keep them in their place and stop them from trying to overthrow the RC
- Religion therefore misleads the poor into thinking their suffering is needed to get into the afterlife which then prevents the poor from rebelling to change their situation
- Religion acts as an 'ideological weapon' for the RC to legitimise the suffering of the poor as something inevitable
- He believes the ruling class controls both economic production, but also the production and distribution of ideas in society
- He also views religion as a product of alienation which is more extreme under capitalism
- Bceause of this alienation, the WC turn to religion as a form of consolation
- Religion acts as the 'opium of masses'
- Helping individuals deal with the pain and stress by distorting their beliefs
- e.g. promising afterlife
- e.g. justifying social order
- The Hindu Caste System shows this as it allows for no movement between castes (classes)
- e.g. giving the hope of supernatural intervention to solve problems on earth
- Helping individuals deal with the pain and stress by distorting their beliefs
- Religion acts as the 'opium of masses'
- Bceause of this alienation, the WC turn to religion as a form of consolation
- Believes religion is an institution maintaining the capitalist rule by distorting peoples perception of reality to serve the needs of the capitalist society
- Marx
- Evaluation
- Engels noted how religion didn't always benefit the ruling class
- Ignores the positive functions
- Neo-Marxists see the forms of religion as assisting, not hindering class consciousness
- Neo-Marxists
- Builds on Marxism by making is applicable to today's society
- Disagrees with Marx that religion is under control of the RC as RC domination is more effective when not involved with religion
- Gramsci
- Economic factors alone cannot maintain the dominance of the RC
- To keep a strong hold on society, the RC has to persuade the masses of society that everything is fair for everyone
- Religion can develop to support the WC and guide their challenges of the RC
- To keep a strong hold on society, the RC has to persuade the masses of society that everything is fair for everyone
- Economic factors alone cannot maintain the dominance of the RC
- Neo-Marxists
- Church Of England only recruits from upper classes, showing a loss of contact with ordinary people (Leach)
- There would be no need for religion if society was classless
- Marxism
- Western societies are becoming more secular which means religion may not be so influential over CC that it used to be
- They believe that societies most basic need is social solidarity and social order through value consensus- without it, individual selfishness would cause social disintergration
- Marxism
- There would be no need for religion if society was classless
- Marx
- Believes religion is an institution maintaining the capitalist rule by distorting peoples perception of reality to serve the needs of the capitalist society
- He believes the ruling class controls both economic production, but also the production and distribution of ideas in society
- Religion acts as an 'ideological weapon' for the RC to legitimise the suffering of the poor as something inevitable
- Religion therefore misleads the poor into thinking their suffering is needed to get into the afterlife which then prevents the poor from rebelling to change their situation
- Lenin describes religion as a 'spiritual gin' confusing the WC to keep them in their place and stop them from trying to overthrow the RC
- Religion therefore misleads the poor into thinking their suffering is needed to get into the afterlife which then prevents the poor from rebelling to change their situation
- Religion acts as an 'ideological weapon' for the RC to legitimise the suffering of the poor as something inevitable
- He believes the ruling class controls both economic production, but also the production and distribution of ideas in society
- He also views religion as a product of alienation which is more extreme under capitalism
- Bceause of this alienation, the WC turn to religion as a form of consolation
- Religion acts as the 'opium of masses'
- Helping individuals deal with the pain and stress by distorting their beliefs
- e.g. promising afterlife
- e.g. justifying social order
- The Hindu Caste System shows this as it allows for no movement between castes (classes)
- e.g. giving the hope of supernatural intervention to solve problems on earth
- Helping individuals deal with the pain and stress by distorting their beliefs
- Religion acts as the 'opium of masses'
- Bceause of this alienation, the WC turn to religion as a form of consolation
- Believes religion is an institution maintaining the capitalist rule by distorting peoples perception of reality to serve the needs of the capitalist society
- Marx
- Evaluation
- Engels noted how religion didn't always benefit the ruling class
- Ignores the positive functions
- Neo-Marxists see the forms of religion as assisting, not hindering class consciousness
- Neo-Marxists
- Builds on Marxism by making is applicable to today's society
- Disagrees with Marx that religion is under control of the RC as RC domination is more effective when not involved with religion
- Gramsci
- Economic factors alone cannot maintain the dominance of the RC
- To keep a strong hold on society, the RC has to persuade the masses of society that everything is fair for everyone
- Religion can develop to support the WC and guide their challenges of the RC
- To keep a strong hold on society, the RC has to persuade the masses of society that everything is fair for everyone
- Economic factors alone cannot maintain the dominance of the RC
- Neo-Marxists
- Church Of England only recruits from upper classes, showing a loss of contact with ordinary people (Leach)
- There would be no need for religion if society was classless
- Functionalist
- El Saadawi
- Argues that the direct cause of womens subordinationwas the introduction or patriarchal forms of society, not just religion
- e.g. men misinterpreting religious beliefs to favour patriarchy
- Feminism
- They argue that religious beliefs function as a patriarchal ideology that legitimises femal subordination
- Evidence of patriarchy
- Religious Organisations - mainly male-dominated even though women often participate more
- e.g. Orthodox Judaism forbid women to become priests
- Armstrong sees this as evidence of women's marginalisation
- Woodhead - womens exclusion from priesthood shows the churches unease about women
- e.g. Orthodox Judaism forbid women to become priests
- Places of worship - often segregate women and seat them behind screens while men occupy sacred areas
- Laws and Customs - may give women fewer rights than men, e.g. how they dress/how many spouses they have
- Religious Organisations - mainly male-dominated even though women often participate more
- Evidence of patriarchy
- Evaluation
- Religion can actually empower women, e.g. women wearing the hijab is seen as oppressive in Western society when actually it can be liberating for them
- Watson - practices that appear oppressive may have other meanings
- Religious groups, such as Quakers, are committed to gender equality
- Women can actually use some rules in religion to gain more status
- They argue that religious beliefs function as a patriarchal ideology that legitimises femal subordination
- Argues that the direct cause of womens subordinationwas the introduction or patriarchal forms of society, not just religion
Comments
No comments have yet been made