Offer
- Created by: Lauren Grace Hemingway
- Created on: 04-01-15 09:58
View mindmap
- OFFER
- failure of a precondition
- FINANCING LTD V STIMSON - if a main term of the offer is not fulfilled or is significantly altered, it ends the offer
- express offers
- TAYLOR V LAIRD - There must be an express offer
- unilateral offers
- CARLILL V CARBOLIC SMOKE BALL CO. - 1) you can have a unilateral offer. 2) Unilateral offers can be accepted by conduct. 3) It's not a mere puff if there is evidence of legal intent
- auctions
- HARRIS V NICKERSON / S57 SALE OF GOODS ACT - an advert to hold an auction is an I2T
- implied offers
- WILKIE V LONDON PASSENGER TRANSPORT BOARD - an offer can be implied from conduct
- BOWERMAN V ABTA - an offer can be implied from circumstance
- 10 ways an offer can end
- STEVENSON V MCLEAN - request for more information is not a counter offer - e.g. enquiring as to whether credit terms are available
- BRADBURY V MORGAN - death ends offer of a personal nature
- DICKINSON V DODDS - an offer may be revoked via a reliable third party
- ROUTLEDGE V GRANT - an offer can be revoked at any time before acceptance, even if initially stated to remain open for a specified period
- SHUEY V US - a unilateral offer must be revoked by the same method used to make the offer in the first place
- BYRNE V VAN TIENHOVEN - an offer cannot be revoked after acceptance
- BUTLER V EX-CELL-O-CORP - in exchange of letters with standard terms, "he who fires the last shot wins" - offer is on the terms of the last letter which is accepted by conduct
- ERRINGTON V ERRINGTON - where acceptance is an ongoing act, the offeror cannot revoke the offer
- RAMSGATE HOTEL V MOTEFIORE - an offer will lapse after a reasonable time if a limit is not specified
- HYDE V WRENCH - a counter offer extinguishes the original offer
- invitation to treat
- PARTRIDGE V CRITTENDEN - an advertisement is an I2T
- Untitled
- FISHER V BELL - display of goods in shop window is I2T
- HARVEY V FACEY - statement of price is an I2T
- PHARMACEU-TICAL SOCIETY OF GB V BOOTS - display in self-service shop is I2T
- GIBSON V MANCHESTER CC - negotiations are I2T unless there is a clear offer
- advertisements
- Untitled
- LEFKOWITZ V GMSS - an advertisement with terms attached is an offer
- Untitled
- failure of a precondition
Similar Law resources:
Teacher recommended
Comments
No comments have yet been made