Negligence_Unfinished
- Created by: Rachel Barber
- Created on: 26-01-14 21:48
View mindmap
- Negligence
- Duty of Care
- Were the consequences of the defendants actions reasonably foreseeable
- Was their sufficient proximity between the claimant and the defendant in terms of time space and relationship
- Is it fair, just and reasonable to impose a duty of care? No if the defendant is...
- The Police
- Hill V Chief Constable of West Yorkshire
- A judge
- Because this will open the floodgates to a number of cases wasting taxpayers money and time
- The Police
- Hill V Chief Constable of West Yorkshire
- The Police
- Because this will open the floodgates to a number of cases wasting taxpayers money and time
- The Ministry of Defence
- Because this will open the floodgates to a number of cases wasting taxpayers money and time
- Because this will open the floodgates to a number of cases wasting taxpayers money and time
- The Police
- Duty of Care
Comments
No comments have yet been made