Civil Disobedience
- Created by: edie cooke
- Created on: 18-04-13 20:22
View mindmap
- Is civil disobedience ever justified?
- Hobbes
- Almost always NO
- What would LOCKE, RAWLS and MILL say about this??
- Believes any government better than none.
- Hobbes
- Almost always NO
- What would LOCKE, RAWLS and MILL say about this??
- Believes any government better than none.
- Believes any government better than none.
- What would LOCKE, RAWLS and MILL say about this??
- 'State of nature' just too awful
- Almost always NO
- Hobbes
- Believes any government better than none.
- What would LOCKE, RAWLS and MILL say about this??
- 'State of nature' just too awful
- Almost always NO
- RAWLS
- Hobbes
- YES, under certain circumstances
- Locke
- Is civil disobedience ever justified?
- RAWLS
- Believes in 'natural law' and will of people
- PROBLEM: Doesn't make clear as to whether we need either or both of the above
- Is civil disobedience ever justified?
- If state violates these, disobedience justified
- Believes in 'natural law' and will of people
- PROBLEM: Doesn't make clear as to whether we need either or both of the above
- Believes in 'natural law' and will of people
- Locke
- If state violates these, disobedience justified
- Rousseau
- NO
- IF the state is totally democratic and represents general will
- NO
- NO
- IF the state is totally democratic and represents general will
- We are more than 'free' when we obey the 'general will'.
- PROBLEM: may lead to what Mill calls the 'tyranny of the majority'
- PROBLEM: may lead to what Mill calls the 'tyranny of the majority'
- PROBLEM: may lead to what Mill calls the 'tyranny of the majority'
- YES, under certain circumstances
- If the state does not live up to the principles of justice
- Are the principles too restrictive????
- Law-breaker also accept consequences of actions
- If the state does not live up to the principles of justice
- Are the principles too restrictive????
Comments
Report
Report