Gender and the public sphere in early modern period

?
  • Created by: Alasdair
  • Created on: 22-05-18 15:12
View mindmap
  • Gender and the public sphere in early modern period (according to Bernard Capp)
    • In most places, women were excluded form political world
      • At very highest level, gender and dynastic principles sometimes collided, as in France, where Salic law forbade a woman to inherit the throne
      • By contrast Isabella of Castile and Elizabeth Tudor ruled successfully
        • Though Henry VIII had feared that only son would be able to preserve his dynasty
      • Later female royal successes
        • Maria Theresa in Austria
        • Catherine the Great in Russia
        • Several female heads of small German territories
    • Nowhere any examples of female monarchs lead to any wider reappraisal
      • Ministers, officials, diplomats were always male and so were urban magistrates
    • In practice, some aristocratic women were able to play very active roles in bloody-thirsty politics of late sixteenth century France
      • e.g. members of the Guise family
    • Women often occupied significant position at royal and princely courts, wielding informal power through personal influence they might have with a king, a minister or favourite
    • Contemporaries recognised wife of landowner, local magistrate or parish officer might be more forceful than her husband
      • Winning her support could offer their best chance of securing a favourable decision
    • Amongst the poor
      • Women quite often became involved in popular politics of a very different kind
        • in riots and demonstrations where gender could play to their advantage
          • According to Houlbrooke and Capp
            • Women protesting over grain supplies or enclosures were less likely to face retribution
              • magistrates recognised female rebellion was unthinkable and might therefore feel more able to make concessions without losing face
      • At neighbourhood level
        • Women played important role in shaping local public opinion
          • often through their 'gossip networks'
          • Public opinion was a weapon of some significance, for retaining a 'good name' mattered to both men and women
            • By ostracising, mocking or rebuking troublesome neighbours or violent, unfaithful husbands, women might shame offenders into mending their ways, and if that failed, their pressure might trigger intervention by parish officers
          • They might rally to support  a respected woman who had come under threat
            • E.g. Margaret Graeme, a Norfolk villager accused of witchcraft in 1590, was defended by several respectable female neighbours who had known her for over twenty years and testified to her good character
              • According to Capp
                • Proceedings against her went no further
    • Gender equally reflected in judicial system
      • Judges, lawyers and juries were male
      • Law regarded husband and wife as one person, the man
        • That generally gave him control over money and goods his wife brought to marriage and any money she might earn
        • Male control over land wife brought remained more limited
        • Husband liable for any debts his wife might incur
        • If husband and wife committed crime together, the court would usually hold husband solely responsible
      • Generally, most crimes committed by men, but some exceptions
        • witchcraft usually associated with women in most parts of Europe
        • Double standard meant that women found guilty of adultery or premarital sex were usually punished more severely than men involved
        • Unmarried mothers suspected of infanticide were assumed to be guilty unless they could prove their innocence
          • Faced almost certain execution until attitudes softened in C18th

Comments

No comments have yet been made

Similar History resources:

See all History resources »See all Gender and Family in Early Modern Period resources »