GBH
- Created by: __Jess
- Created on: 13-02-23 20:15
View mindmap
- GBH
- Actus reus
- Unlawfully wound or inflict GBH on another person
- Unlawfully
- Punishment of a child cannot be lawful for GBH
- R v Hopley
- Consent can apply in specific situations, such as sports and surgery
- Acting in self-defence and crime prevention is lawful, as long as it's proportional
- Punishment of a child cannot be lawful for GBH
- Wound
- A break in the continuity of the skin
- An internal rupture of blood vessels is not a wound
- C v Eisenhower
- Grievous bodily harm
- Really serious harm
- DPP v Smith
- Objectively assessed
- R v Brown and Stratton
- Victim's vulnerability is taken into account
- R v Bollom
- Includes psychiatric injury
- R v Burstow
- Really serious harm
- Inflict
- Includes indirect application of force
- R v Martin
- Includes indirect application of force
- Unlawfully
- Unlawfully wound or inflict GBH on another person
- Mens rea
- S.20
- Intent or reckless as to the causing of some level of harm
- R v Savage
- Subjective recklessness applies
- R v Parmenter
- Intent or reckless as to the causing of some level of harm
- S.18
- Intent to cause GBH
- Intent to resist arrest
- S.20
- Actus reus
Comments
No comments have yet been made