Formation of Relationships
- Created by: AlexBorn
- Created on: 08-03-16 13:11
View mindmap
- Formation of Relationships
- Socio-biological
- Dunbar and McGuiness
- Physical attractiveness 68% women 51% men
- Cameron et al
- Harrison and Saeed
- Difficult for other cultures to generalise to
- Cameron et al
- Physical attractiveness 68% women 51% men
- Dunbar and Waynforth
- Seek complimentry characteristics from their mate
- Large sample easier to generalise to
- Supported by Buss
- Only 4 newspapers used could be biased
- Large sample easier to generalise to
- Seek complimentry characteristics from their mate
- Dunbar and McGuiness
- Reinforcement Affect Theory
- Seek rewarding experiences from the people we meet
- Cunningham
- Griffit and Guay
- Support settings were highly artificial
- Lott
- Cunningham
- Seek rewarding experiences from the people we meet
- Filter Model of Attraction
- Intro
- Different models for how we form relationships
- Socio-biological
- Bryne and Clore
- Women - physical attractiveness Men - economic status
- Men - attractive women Women - trustworthy men
- Men watched a happy or sad movie, measured interaction with females
- More positive feedback got for work, more positive view of researcher
- Other cultures women focus on others needs
- Kerchkoff and Davis
- Filter to remove those who we would least likely to form relationship
- Festinger et al
- Kerchkoff
- Filter to remove those who we would least likely to form relationship
- Proximity increases likelihood of relationships
- Quantitative data
- Natural Setting
- Ebbesen et al
- Quantitative data
- Enemies likely to in close proximity
- Difficult to generalise to
- Married couples come from similar social, economics and religious backgrounds
- Newcomb
- Gruber-Baldini et al
- Cultural and sexual bias
- Newcomb
- Strangers and then became friends tended to have similar attributes
- Similar age and educational level more likely to stay together
Comments
No comments have yet been made