class and crime
done in note form
- Created by: Rhianna Hall
- Created on: 12-06-14 17:14
View mindmap
- class
- Funct
- crime is good for soc - maint consensus
- reinf bound via pun
- w/c crime
- satisfied w/ role @ bottom of soc
- poor socialisation & frust
- 1 parents fam - no discipline
- w/c rejection f/ soc/school
- illegit opp structure
- Merton - 5 responses
- CIRRR
- CIRRR
- satisfied w/ role @ bottom of soc
- m/c crime
- don't commit crime
- effectively socialised
- legit opp structure
- Cap gives head start @ school
- legit opp structure
- Merton - conformity
- accept goals & institutional means
- effectively socialised
- don't commit crime
- EVAL
- ig w.c.c
- ig age, gender ethnicity etc
- ig sel pol
- trust courts, pol, figs?
- pol & courts = fair
- pun rem troublemakers & imp soc cont in wider soc
- pol focus on areas where trouble is excessive
- pol & courts = fair
- subc
- how groups can form alt cultures that drive them into crime
- w/c
- w/c youths feel frust due to status so form subc
- alt v's to mainst soc
- Miller - focal concerns
- STAFET
- w/c youths feel frust due to status so form subc
- m/c
- don't commit crime - don't feel status f - do well in school
- legit opp structure
- conf to mainst v's
- legit opp structure
- don't commit crime - don't feel status f - do well in school
- can trust courts, pol & figs?
- yes - place blame on indiv - status f
- EVAL
- not every crim is part of subc
- no mention of women
- too deterministic
- eco
- closer to city centre = anomie - no-one knows you
- soc cont in city = lim
- Tonnies - the lonely crowd
- soc cont in city = lim
- w/c
- zone of transition - zone 2 - rapid soc change
- routine activities (Cohen & Felson)
- crime occurs in familiar & low risk areas
- linked to activities & lives of victim
- happen when victim & offenders lifes coincide
- no capable guardian
- happen when victim & offenders lifes coincide
- linked to activities & lives of victim
- crime occurs in familiar & low risk areas
- m/c
- institution of priv = CCTV
- neigh watch
- suburbia = consensus
- trust pol etc?
- yes - m/c don't commit crime
- EVAL
- ig w.c.c crime
- ig labelling process
- ig moral pan
- closer to city centre = anomie - no-one knows you
- Marxism
- cap - wealth & pov
- exploitation
- w/c
- greed - ineq & frust - dev
- eco dep - criminogenic = ineq
- Althusser - ISA - rich = rich & poor = poor
- Mannhiem - law protects priv prop of r/c
- m/c
- commit crime - makes laws to serve selves - tax evasion
- socialised that greedy = good
- w.c.c. & corporate crime - detection issues, types - employee theft, tax fraud etc
- trust?
- no - poor focued on too much - drives attention away f/ r/c
- sel pol
- EVAL
- ig labelling process
- many laws ben w/c - welfare
- too determ
- cap - wealth & pov
- control
- Hirschi - bonds - commitment, involvement, belief
- w/c
- 1 parent fam - lack of atta to soc = crim
- Dennis - fams without fatherhood - changing role of women & increase in fathers leaving
- m/c
- surveillance - neigh watch
- inf soc cont
- > likely to dob on misbeh neigh - unlike w/c
- surveillance - neigh watch
- trust?
- yes - should have morals to know bet good & bad beh through socialisation
- EVAL
- mainly focus on street crime
- nothers can socialise kids to not be dev
- Funct
Comments
No comments have yet been made