Anselm's Second Ontological Argument
- Created by: Laura McClelland
- Created on: 19-05-19 16:30
View mindmap
- Anselm's Second Ontological Argument
- Explaining the Argument
- He extends his definition of God to be a 'necessary being'
- Response to Guanilo's critique
- felt that his critique was a misplaced comparison
- Guanilo was talking about something which was contingent, rather than necessary
- Aquinas argued that we are too limited to full grasp the depths of the proposition and as such unable to know this a priori
- Explaining the Argument
Comments
No comments have yet been made