Anselm's Second Ontological Argument

View mindmap
  • Anselm's Second Ontological Argument
    • Explaining the Argument
      • He extends his definition of God to be a 'necessary being'
      • Response to Guanilo's critique
        • felt that his critique was a misplaced comparison
        • Guanilo was talking about something which was contingent, rather than necessary
      • Aquinas argued that we are too limited to full grasp the depths of the proposition and as such unable to know this a priori

Comments

No comments have yet been made

Similar Religious Studies resources:

See all Religious Studies resources »See all Philosophy resources »