Visual Searches

?
Visual search - what is it?
Searching a cluttered scene for a specific target
1 of 31
What is a feature search?
Where the target you are looking for has a specific feature that makes it "pop-out" in the display
2 of 31
What is a conjunctive search?
Where the target you are looking for doesn't have one specific feature that makes it stand out but shares its features w other items in the display - only one to have the conjunction of features
3 of 31
Which one is harder?
Conjunctive
4 of 31
Treisman (1988, 1992) - what theory?
Feature Integration Theory
5 of 31
Basis of FIT?
That features of objects (size, shape, etc.) are separable from the objects themselves
6 of 31
Stages of FIT
Object --> PREATTENTIVE stage --> FOCUSED ATTENTION stage --> Perception
7 of 31
What happens in Preattentive stage?
Rapid initial parallel process to identify features / large differences noticed
8 of 31
What happens in Focused Attention stage?
Slower, serial process to form objects from combining features - requires attention to 'glue' the features together - feature combination can be influenced by prior knowledge
9 of 31
Evidence for FIT:
"pop-out" not affected by no. of distractors / illusory conjunctions
10 of 31
What are illusory conjunctions?
Where you haven't glued features together in the pre attentive stage so you get illusory conjunctions (of features)
11 of 31
When do illusory conjunctions occur?
when focused attention is absent / relevant stored knowledge is absent / spatial attention is diverted (CAN HAPPEN ACROSS SPACE NOT TIME)
12 of 31
Evidence against FIT:
Duncan and Humphreys (1989) / Negative-priming tasks (Tipper, 1985)
13 of 31
Duncan & Humphreys (1989) - What?
Found finding target 'L' was harder when T (distractor) was rotated 180 or 270 degrees vs 0 & 90 (FIT can't explain as both conjunctive searches)
14 of 31
How do they explain their results?
D&H say it can be explained in terms of how similar the distractors are / easiness to group objects together
15 of 31
What do negative priming tasks show evidence of?
Show evidence for semantic processing of unattended stimuli (FIT says attention is required for this)
16 of 31
Wolfe (1998) - what theory?
Guided Search theory / Dual-Path model
17 of 31
What is it?
instead of assuming initial f. pro is parallel and subsequent pro is serial - Wolfe assumes a mix of serial & parallel strategies are used for visual searches
18 of 31
What is the activation map?
Places in a scene have different activations depending on their relevance - places w/ highest activation gets attention first
19 of 31
Ehinger et al., (2009) - what?
Recorded eye fixations nd found observers fixated to relevant parts of the scene early on - told to look for people, ignored the sky and other parts due to prior knowledge
20 of 31
Posner's attentional systems - what are they?
Endogenous System / Exogenous System
21 of 31
Endogenous system - what?
Top-down, goal driven // controlled by ind's intentions & expectations - involved when informative, central cues are presented
22 of 31
Exogenous system - what?
Bottom-up, stimulus driven // automatically shifts attention, involved when uninformative peripheral cues are presented - salient or different stimuli most likely to be attended
23 of 31
Parietal Cortex & Feature Binding - Treisman (1999)?
Patient RM - 2 strokes - damaged large areas of bilateral occipito-parietal cortex / unable to focus attention one +1 object or switch attention / had severe feature binding issues
24 of 31
Patient RM's feature binding issues - time?
Made illusory conjunction errors even when showed image for 10 secs / healthy brain only makes these when shown for 1
25 of 31
Parietal lesions can cause binding problems across _ _ _ _ _ but not _ _ _ _?
space / time
26 of 31
What findings demonstrate parietal lobe importance for spatial attention?
Neuropsychological findings
27 of 31
Where in the brain are lesions also associated w/ impaired feature binding?
Thalamus lesions
28 of 31
Binding problem - what?
How are different features of an object bound together (Temporal coding)
29 of 31
C. Von der Malsburg (1981) - what hypothesis?
Temporal correlation hypothesis
30 of 31
Singer and Gray (1995) - what?
Suggested that gamma oscillations might be relevant for binding by temporal synchrony / some EEG studies found enhanced gamma oscillations in conditions that require more binding & spatial attention
31 of 31

Other cards in this set

Card 2

Front

What is a feature search?

Back

Where the target you are looking for has a specific feature that makes it "pop-out" in the display

Card 3

Front

What is a conjunctive search?

Back

Preview of the front of card 3

Card 4

Front

Which one is harder?

Back

Preview of the front of card 4

Card 5

Front

Treisman (1988, 1992) - what theory?

Back

Preview of the front of card 5
View more cards

Comments

No comments have yet been made

Similar Psychology resources:

See all Psychology resources »See all Visual System resources »