Unjustified Enrichment 0.0 / 5 ? LawUnjustified EnrichmentUniversityAQA Created by: eszter_Created on: 05-03-23 10:34 Shilliday v Smith 1998 SC 725 Shilliday improved Smith's house in anticipation of marriage and recovered value of improvements using condictio causa data causa non secuta 1 of 5 Satchwell v McIntosh 2006 SLT (Sh Ct) 117 Condictio causa data causa non secuta can be used in an agreement to continue cohabiting 2 of 5 Harper Collins Publishers Ltd v Young [2007] CSOH 65 Property sold and therefore profit from sale recoverable 3 of 5 Responses to Unjustified Enrichment - Restitution - Repetition - Recompense - Shilliday v Smith 1998 SC 725 4 of 5 Recompense Recovery of a benefit, content expressed in extent of D's enrichment 5 of 5
Comments
No comments have yet been made