A room was provided by a holiday company which did not match the brochure description. The judge stated that the Trade Descriptions act prohibits false descriptions under the pain of penalties enforced by the criminal courts- encourages vigliance
1 of 5
R V Howells
D was liable despite being aware that he required a license and had no intention to use the gun as a weapon
2 of 5
Environment Agency V Brook
A leakage of pollutants caused by a defect in a seal which D did not foresee. Although this was rare it was considered as an ordinary fact file so were liable.
3 of 5
Tesco Ltd v Nattrass (1972)
Accused of indicating that goods were on sale at a lower price than they are. Their defence was that it was the store managers fault for not checking shelves properly. HOL allowed defence.
4 of 5
PSGB V Storkwain
The pharmacist had a genuine belief the prescription was valid.
5 of 5
Other cards in this set
Card 2
Front
R V Howells
Back
D was liable despite being aware that he required a license and had no intention to use the gun as a weapon
Comments
No comments have yet been made