More cards in this set

Card 6

Front

Finish the case - Smedley's v ____

Back

Preview of the front of card 6

Card 7

Front

Case involving pollution of water

Back

Preview of the front of card 7

Card 8

Front

Case involving lottery tickets

Back

Preview of the front of card 8

Card 9

Front

What section of the Road Traffic Act 1988 states that it is an offence to to ‘drive with excess alcohol in the blood, breath or urine'?

Back

Preview of the front of card 9

Card 10

Front

What case tells us that the courts must always start with the presumption that mens rea is required?

Back

Preview of the front of card 10

Card 11

Front

What case tells us that the more serious the offence, the greater the weight to be attached to the presumption of mens rea?

Back

Preview of the front of card 11

Card 12

Front

Name the case - S.13 did not contain any mens rea words, but other sections of the act contain the word ‘knowingly’, so where the offence contains no mens rea words but other sections of the Act do it is likely that this offence is one of SL?

Back

Preview of the front of card 12

Card 13

Front

What case summarised the rules?

Back

Preview of the front of card 13