When the judges take the ordinary and natural meaning of the word and apply it, even if t creates an absurd result.
1 of 14
A case related to the Literal rule is
Whitely v Chapell (1868)
2 of 14
In this case the man was found not guilty for
Impersonating, a dead person as the person was dead and could not be associated with the law of committing a electoral malpractice.
3 of 14
The, Golden rule
Is, an extension of the literal rule.The judge will alter the words in a statute so that it makes sense.
4 of 14
A famous case the is associated to the golden rule is
R v Allen (1872)
5 of 14
In this case the
The wording of the Offences Against the person Act (1861) had to be given a different interpretation for the crime of bigamy, because the way it was written meant that crimes could never be committed.
6 of 14
In this case the defendant
sentences was quashed as he had his fingers in his coat pretending to have a gun during a robbery which came under the Firearms Act 1968
7 of 14
The mischief Rule ...
Looks at the gap in the previous law and interprets the words
8 of 14
A case related to this rule is
Smith v Hughes (1981)
9 of 14
The purposive approach is
When, judges are given most flexibility when deciding what parliament intended to stop when making the rule
10 of 14
A case related to this approach is
Royal college of nursing v Dhss (19810
11 of 14
In this case which act was used ?
Abortion act 1967
12 of 14
Rules of Language are
Ejusdem generis, Expressio unius and Noscitur a sociis
13 of 14
the three language rules in the correct order mean
General words which follow a list are limited to the same kind,The express menton f one thing excludes others and A word is known by the company it keeps
14 of 14
Other cards in this set
Card 2
Front
A case related to the Literal rule is
Back
Whitely v Chapell (1868)
Card 3
Front
In this case the man was found not guilty for
Back
Card 4
Front
The, Golden rule
Back
Card 5
Front
A famous case the is associated to the golden rule is
the answer for number 1 is wrong aswell jus 2 let u knw. the literal rule is When the judges take the ordinary and natural meaning of the word and apply it, even if t creates an absurd result.u said itz wrong wen itz right.:)
Comments
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report