Tajfel and Turner's minimal groups studies concluded that
Back
Card 9
Front
3 variables that contribute to in group favouritism?
Back
Card 10
Front
Tajfel et al (Klee and Klandinsky) found
Back
Card 11
Front
A strength is that Willets and Clarke (2013) suggested that
Back
Card 12
Front
A weakness is that the theory may be too simplistic in explaining prejudice as
Back
Card 13
Front
Realistic Conflict Theory offers an alternative explanation of prejudice which states that prejudice only takes place when
Back
Card 14
Front
There are many supporting studies that demonstrate in-group favouritism, e.g
Back
Card 15
Front
A closer look at the minimal groups studies indicates that individual participants differed considerably in the extent to which they favoured the in group over the out group, e.g
