There was a failure to mention facts, based in lawyer's legal advice in Condron - what did the court hold?
Back
Card 7
Front
What did court say in Argent regarding a failure to mention facts following legal advice?
Back
Card 8
Front
Which case held that it is a balancing act between: not allowing D to "drive a coach and horses through s.34" by allowing legal advice to be a reason for silence + Ds not having to reveal terms of legal advice if they act in accordance with it
Back
Card 9
Front
What might be waived if D cites legal advice as the reason for his silence?
Back
Card 10
Front
In what ways was there a failure to give D a fair trial in Condron?
Back
Card 11
Front
What are 3 of 8 propositions put forward in Seaton?
Back
Card 12
Front
What are the other 4 propositions put forward in Seaton?
Back
Card 13
Front
Which case affirmed the legitimacy of prepared statements?
Back
Card 14
Front
Is the legitimacy of prepared statements in line with s.34 purpose?
Back
Card 15
Front
What is another reason given in Knight to suggest that prepared statements are entirely legitimate?
