Skip to content
Get Revising
Search:
Keyword:
Go
Subject
Resource type:
Resource type (all)
Flashcards
Revision cards
Revision notes
Quizzes
Mindmaps
Crosswords
Organise your thinking
Quizsearches
Shared resources
Join
Join Get Revising
Start learning now
Already a member?
Please sign in
Email address
Password
Forgotten your password?
Remember my details
Log in
Create
GCSE
A Level & IB
University
Study planner
Past papers
For teachers
More cards in this set
Card 6
Front
A (no 2): what did Lord Hope say about there being a possible infringement?
Back
Card 7
Front
A (no 2): What did Lord Steyn say posed a slight proportionality issue?
Back
Card 8
Front
A (no 2): which judge said that evidence of a relationship between C + D will probably be relevant?
Back
Card 9
Front
A (no 2): what is the key test of admissibility following this case?
Back
Card 10
Front
Who said that the success of this provision was undermined by A (no 2)?
Back
Card 11
Front
How do Kelly et al say A (no 2) has translated into practice?
Back
Card 12
Front
What other 2 points do Kelly et al make regarding the success of the 1999 legislation?
Back
Card 13
Front
In which case was A (no 2) applied and led to conclusion that D would be deprived of a fair trial (previous evidence relationship)?
Back
Card 14
Front
What happened in Harris (which led to evidence being inadmissible as it didn't fall under s.41(3)(c))?
Back
Card 15
Front
Which provision was held to have a role in all 3 exceptions in Hamadi?
Back
See full card set
