Back to quiz

6. What are some examples of what can't be taken into account ebcause they are not characteristics of a person of reasonable firmness?

  • Horne (1995)- pliability, timidity, undue susceptibility to threats. Bowen (1999) voluntary intoxication, sexual orientation.
  • Horne (1994)- pliability, timidity, undue susceptibility to threats. Bowen (1996) voluntary intoxication, sexual orientation.
  • Horne (1994)- pliability, timidity, undue susceptibility to threats.
  • Horne (1995)- PTSD, timidity, recognised mental condition. Bowen (1999) voluntary intoxication, sexual orientation.

7. What happens if Duress is successful and why?

  • Complete acquittal - the wrong done by D is of lesser gravity than one which would've been done by threaten-er
  • Reduced sentence - the wrong done by D is excused if the crime is not murder
  • Reduced sentence - the wrong done by D is of lesser gravity than one which would've been done by threaten-er
  • Complete acquittal - the wrong done by D is excused because of threats to family

8. What happened in Abdul - Hussain and others 1999

  • D - Hijack plane , landed at Stansted, escaping Taliban.
  • D- Muslims fleeing Iraq, make it to Sudan but fear deportation to Iraq and torture and murder; hijack a plane. Defence not allowed- harm not imminent but prospect sufficient
  • D- Muslims fleeing Iraq, make it to Sudan but fear deportation to Iraq and torture and murder; hijack a plane. Defence allowed- harm not imminent but prospect sufficient
  • Joined terrorist group, no defence for robbery

9. What is Necessity?

  • D is compelled to act because the harm likely to be caused by him not acting would be far greater.
  • D is compelled to act because harm might be caused if they didn't act
  • D is compelled to act by a specific set of circumstances
  • D is compelled to act because of direct threats from C of harm to himself or someone for whom he is responsible

10. What is the subjective test in Graham 1982 ?

  • Threats of imminent death. Did D act the way he did because of threats?
  • Threats of imminent death or serious physical injury. Did D act the way he did because of threats? Threats must be serious (Conway 1989) and can be against stranger (Pommell)
  • Did D act the way he did because of threats? Threats must be serious (Conway 1989) and can be against stranger (Pommell)
  • Threats of imminent death or serious physical injury.

11. What cases show the difficulty to distinguish between necessity and duress?

  • Shayler 2003 (MI6 info leaked) and Pomell 1994 (found in bed with gun to prevent crime)
  • Shayler 2001 (MI6 info leaked) and Pomell 1995 (found in bed with gun to prevent crime)
  • Shayner 2004 (MI6) and Cole 1994 (borderline, circumstances)
  • Cole 1994 (borderline, circumstances) and Shayler 2001 (MI6)

12. When can duress not succeed as a defence? (remember wilson 2007, dad ordered son to help him kill mum)

  • If the crime is murder or manslaughter
  • If the crime is treason or terrorism
  • If the crime is murder or accessory to murder
  • If the crime is treason or murder

13. What is the most authoritative case?

  • Hasan 2005 (Plane hijacking) Conviction quashed
  • Hasan 2005 (Aggravated burglary- threats of harm to family if didn't commit crime) Conviction quashed
  • Hasan 2009 (Aggravated burglary- threats of harm to family if didn't commit crime) Conviction quashed
  • Hasan 2005 (Aggravated burglary- threats of harm to family if didn't pay money)