Skip to content
Get Revising
Search:
Keyword:
Go
Subject
Resource type:
Resource type (all)
Flashcards
Revision cards
Revision notes
Quizzes
Mindmaps
Crosswords
Organise your thinking
Quizsearches
Shared resources
Join
Join Get Revising
Start learning now
Already a member?
Please sign in
Email address
Password
Forgotten your password?
Remember my details
Log in
Create
GCSE
A Level & IB
University
Study planner
Past papers
For teachers
More cards in this set
Card 16
Front
Case that says there must be 'substantial detriment'
Back
Card 17
Front
Explain Jennings v Rice [2003]
Back
Card 18
Front
Point in Sledmore v Dalby [1996]
Back
Card 19
Front
Explain the criteria of unconscionability
Back
Card 20
Front
Case- The result must shock the conscience of the court
Back
Card 21
Front
Why is a claim in proprietary estoppel risky?
Back
Card 22
Front
Case- 'the minimum equity to do justice between the parties'
Back
Card 23
Front
Explain Davies v Davies [2015]
Back
Card 24
Front
Does the equity bind the representer's successors in title? Statute?
Back
Card 25
Front
Similarities between proprietary estoppel and constructive trusts
Back
View more cards