Back to quiz

6. Where can we see if itss more reproducible?

  • Case Study 1
  • Case Study 2
  • Case Study 3
  • Case Study 4

7. How could the results be useful in the context you have researched?

  • Using the ray of light
  • Angle of incidence
  • I have researched a rear view mirror on a car
  • They wont

8. Do your results support the hypothesis?

  • Maybe
  • Not sure
  • Yes
  • No

9. What was the cause of uncertanties in your measurements?

  • Uncertanites occur due to human error
  • There was none
  • Angle of incidence was categorial
  • The tables were wrong

10. Why was this?

  • As it produces a straight line graph
  • Because you can read any point from my result graph
  • They are both the same
  • Because they both didnt work

11. If so why do they support the hypothesis?

  • They have good angles
  • They produce a straight line graph because as the angle of incidence increases the angle of reflection is similar or the same
  • They dont
  • They have no angle of incidence

12. What was the independant variable in your investigation?

  • Angle of light
  • The independant variable was the angle of incidence
  • Angle of reflection
  • Uncertanties occur due to human error

13. What changes would you make?

  • Some
  • Use a wider range of values and a smaller intervil
  • I wouldnt make any changes
  • Incorrect ones

14. Was this continous or categorial?

  • Neither
  • Continuous
  • Continuous and categorial
  • Categorial

15. Would you make any changes to your experiment?

  • Depends what the results are
  • No
  • Yes
  • Maybe

16. How could you get uncertanties?

  • Taking the angle of incidence away from the angle of reflection
  • By measuring the angles incorrectly as it would be hard to measure exactly the centre of each ray of light
  • Not sure
  • Make a new table