Skip to content
Back to quiz
6. Where can we see if itss more reproducible?
- Case Study 1
- Case Study 2
- Case Study 3
- Case Study 4
7. How could the results be useful in the context you have researched?
- Using the ray of light
- Angle of incidence
- I have researched a rear view mirror on a car
- They wont
8. Do your results support the hypothesis?
9. What was the cause of uncertanties in your measurements?
- Uncertanites occur due to human error
- There was none
- Angle of incidence was categorial
- The tables were wrong
10. Why was this?
- As it produces a straight line graph
- Because you can read any point from my result graph
- They are both the same
- Because they both didnt work
11. If so why do they support the hypothesis?
- They have good angles
- They produce a straight line graph because as the angle of incidence increases the angle of reflection is similar or the same
- They dont
- They have no angle of incidence
12. What was the independant variable in your investigation?
- Angle of light
- The independant variable was the angle of incidence
- Angle of reflection
- Uncertanties occur due to human error
13. What changes would you make?
- Some
- Use a wider range of values and a smaller intervil
- I wouldnt make any changes
- Incorrect ones
14. Was this continous or categorial?
- Neither
- Continuous
- Continuous and categorial
- Categorial
15. Would you make any changes to your experiment?
- Depends what the results are
- No
- Yes
- Maybe
16. How could you get uncertanties?
- Taking the angle of incidence away from the angle of reflection
- By measuring the angles incorrectly as it would be hard to measure exactly the centre of each ray of light
- Not sure
- Make a new table