Nuisance Cases
- Created by: Amy
- Created on: 05-04-17 01:26
I | E | R | R | C | K | L | K | F | I | V | R | I | A | E | J | L | F | S | L | T |
N | B | H | A | H | K | X | R | C | Y | H | E | F | S | H | J | V | Y | U | Q | Y |
T | B | U | V | R | K | U | R | E | G | C | F | E | V | X | J | V | B | P | H | A |
G | A | N | G | I | E | R | I | O | E | V | D | N | H | A | V | S | U | S | M | S |
X | P | T | T | S | N | J | B | J | V | W | F | K | S | H | W | U | G | L | K | T |
J | N | E | P | T | N | V | G | P | H | Q | R | J | E | S | R | T | P | K | P | B |
V | K | R | H | I | A | X | P | X | J | S | K | Q | S | R | O | J | U | X | X | K |
X | M | V | P | E | W | C | J | Y | O | R | Q | F | A | U | I | X | F | S | C | B |
O | M | C | O | V | A | U | L | V | O | W | F | O | C | S | J | J | S | I | G | Q |
C | B | A | G | D | Y | X | B | L | F | J | Q | N | Y | J | Q | R | V | J | U | Y |
L | E | N | B | A | V | R | H | C | W | L | T | E | C | D | V | W | L | X | H | Q |
D | H | A | W | V | T | E | R | G | E | X | H | K | N | X | I | S | Q | B | I | X |
C | L | R | Y | E | H | P | U | J | M | M | V | G | E | Y | G | B | S | Q | J | O |
U | L | Y | G | Y | O | A | P | E | U | V | X | W | U | K | M | J | H | A | G | J |
R | K | W | S | M | M | J | M | C | S | I | Q | S | Q | T | L | T | I | I | G | X |
R | H | H | G | A | P | O | O | J | M | S | P | J | E | U | W | P | N | Y | B | J |
V | P | A | J | L | S | V | O | L | S | K | C | N | R | N | S | I | C | F | P | N |
P | E | R | F | I | O | B | Q | L | T | A | K | D | F | Q | F | H | A | R | F | L |
L | N | F | M | C | N | E | W | J | S | E | C | J | J | O | F | D | U | X | M | N |
Q | C | G | B | E | N | I | E | K | A | H | B | E | T | X | O | C | V | K | S | H |
A | N | M | Q | J | D | S | M | U | B | P | F | T | O | M | O | I | Y | J | I | M |
Clues
- 690 residents claimed that the Canary Wharf development had caused substantial discomfort and inconvenience. Have to have an interest in the land – a mere licensee has no right to sue. (6, 1, 6, 5)
- D's use of his house to make a noise was done maliciously and purely for annoyance –C was therefore granted an injunction. (8, 1, 5, 6)
- Matania – temporary nuisance. Crown River Cruises – every 20 minutes could constitute nuisance. Rushmer v Polsue – what is reasonable in the day may become unreasonable if conducted at night. (9, 5)
- Nearly all of us living in these islands have to put up with a certain amount of annoyance from our neighbours. (8, 1, 8)
Comments
No comments have yet been made