More cards in this set

Card 16

Front

What do CPS say is ABH

Back

Preview of the front of card 16

Card 17

Front

Grievous Bodily Harm

Back

Preview of the front of card 17

Card 18

Front

Would this suggest there is a different between causing and inflicting GBH?

Back

Preview of the front of card 18

Card 19

Front

DPP v Parmenter [1992] 1 AC 699: confirmed test of subjective recklessness

Back

Preview of the front of card 19

Card 20

Front

What is AR of GBH?

Back

Preview of the front of card 20

Card 21

Front

THEREFORE, was held, court said to wound you need to have a break in the continuity of the skin

Back

Preview of the front of card 21

Card 22

Front

R v Bollom [2003]- people babysitting a child who ends up getting injured, judge asked if these facts would constitute GBH, since he was 17 months old

Back

Preview of the front of card 22

Card 23

Front

R v Birmingham [2002]

Back

Preview of the front of card 23

Card 24

Front

R v Burstow [1997]

Back

Preview of the front of card 24

Card 25

Front

R v Wilson [1984] AC 242: Inflict does not necessarily involve assault or battery, just that D’s voluntary actions “directly result” in GBH.

Back

Preview of the front of card 25
View more cards