Negligence 0.0 / 5 ? LawLaw of TortA2/A-levelAQA Created by: Rachael649Created on: 13-03-14 19:28 Describe the first test in Caparo? 1) Was the damage, loss of harm reasonably foreseeable? 1 of 9 Describe the second test in Caparo? Was there a sufficent relationship of proximity between the parties? 2 of 9 What is the third test of Caparo? Is it fair, just or reasonable to impose a duty of care? 3 of 9 What is the neighbour principle in Donoghue v Stevenson? Anyone that you have to have in contemplation as being affected by your actions 4 of 9 Name a case which goes with the magnitude of likely harm Bolton v Stone ( lower) 5 of 9 Name a case which goes with the forseeability of harm Roe v Minister of Health ( no breach) Hospital following normal procedures 6 of 9 Name a case which goes with the extent of possible harm Paris v Stepney borough council ( he was not given goggles) 7 of 9 What are the two cases to show D has been neligent Mc Ghee ( D in breach) Wilsher ( D was in breach) 8 of 9 Describe the cases of Wagon mound Damage to the wharf was reasonably forseeable. Damage to the ship was too remote 9 of 9
Comments
No comments have yet been made