Negligence

?
Bourhill v Young
(Caparo test) reasonable foresight of harm to the particular claimant
1 of 6
Palmer v Tees HA
Sufficient proximity of relationship between the claimant and defendant
2 of 6
Stovin v Wise
No liability for omission
3 of 6
Home Office v Dorset Yacht Co Ltd
Exception where there is a duty to act positively, a person has some sort of power or control over another
4 of 6
Carmarthenshire County Council v Lewis
No omission care, Duty to act postively can arise where the defendant is in position of power or control over another
5 of 6
Bolam v Friern
The skilled defendant, not in breach if acting in accordance with such a practice, merely because there is a body of opinion which takes a contrary view
6 of 6

Other cards in this set

Card 2

Front

Sufficient proximity of relationship between the claimant and defendant

Back

Palmer v Tees HA

Card 3

Front

No liability for omission

Back

Preview of the back of card 3

Card 4

Front

Exception where there is a duty to act positively, a person has some sort of power or control over another

Back

Preview of the back of card 4

Card 5

Front

No omission care, Duty to act postively can arise where the defendant is in position of power or control over another

Back

Preview of the back of card 5
View more cards

Comments

No comments have yet been made

Similar Law resources:

See all Law resources »See all tort resources »