Insanity and Automatism 0.0 / 5 ? LawDefenceA2/A-levelAQA Created by: ritateixeira7Created on: 15-12-14 16:20 21054813976 Across 1. What distinguishes automatism from insanity? (8, 6) 5. In which case was it held that a defect of reason means that the Defendants powers of reasoning are impaired (6) 6. In which case was it held that 'wrong' meant 'legally wrong'? (6) 7. Which case held: ‘It could be organic, as in epilepsy, or functional.’ (8) 10. What is the Leading case? (9) Down 2. What is the first element? (6, 2, 6) 3. How many elements are there to this defence? (5) 4. ‘A complete loss of voluntary control that was not caused by what the person could reasonably foresee and is not a self-induced incapacity or one that was a result of a disease of the mind’. (10) 8. Which case held ‘The condition of the brain is irrelevant and so is the question whether the condition of the mind is curable or incurable, transitory or permanent’. (4) 9. In which case was diabetes regarded as an internal cause? (8)
Comments
No comments have yet been made