More cards in this set

Card 6

Front

R v Richardson (1999) – Fraud by the defendant

Back

Preview of the front of card 6

Card 7

Front

Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board (2015) – duty to inform is not a duty to bombard with information

Back

Preview of the front of card 7

Card 8

Front

Taylor v Shropshire Health Authority (1998) – the absence of a consent form is not proof that a patient did not consent, oral consent

Back

Preview of the front of card 8

Card 9

Front

Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee (1957) – breach of the duty to care

Back

Preview of the front of card 9

Card 10

Front

Sidaway v Board of Governors of the Bethlem Royal Hospital and the Maudsley Hospital (1985) – three different approaches on how breach should be determined.

Back

Preview of the front of card 10

Card 11

Front

Blyth v Bloomsbury HA (1993) – post-Sidaway case, a restrictive approach

Back

Preview of the front of card 11

Card 12

Front

Pearce v United Bristol Healthcare NHS Trust (1999) – bye-bye Bolam? Combine prudent patient standard with a reasonable doctor standard

Back

Preview of the front of card 12

Card 13

Front

Smith v Tunbridge Wells HA (1994) – bye-bye Bolam? ‘neither reasonable nor responsible’

Back

Preview of the front of card 13

Card 14

Front

Wyatt v Curtis (2003) – bye-bye Bolam?

Back

Preview of the front of card 14

Card 15

Front

Spencer v Hillingdon (2015) – odd decision

Back

Preview of the front of card 15
View more cards