Hancock et al.'s Study on the Language of Psychopaths 0.0 / 5 ? PsychologyIndividual DifferencesA2/A-levelOCR Created by: Marcus2600Created on: 06-12-19 17:44 What was the research method? Self-Report 1 of 14 How many psychopaths and non-psychopaths were used? 14 and 38 2 of 14 What was the sampling method? Self-Selected 3 of 14 How were psychopathic criminals differentiated from non-psychopathic ones? They scored 25+ on the PCL-R 4 of 14 What type of data was collected Both 5 of 14 What is the order of Maslow's Hierarchy of needs starting from the base? Basic Physiological needs, Safety and comfort, Belonging and love, Esteem, Self-actualisation 6 of 14 How were the types of words analysed? Wmatrix 7 of 14 How was the affectiveness of language measured? DAL 8 of 14 How many subordinate conjunctions did each group use? P NP 1.82% 1.54% 9 of 14 How many more disfluencies did psychopaths have compared to non-psychopaths? 33% 10 of 14 It was concluded that psychopaths viewed their crime as more in the past because? They used more past tense verbs 11 of 14 Where did prisoners come from? Canadian Correctional Facilities 12 of 14 What was the aim of the study To see whether psychopaths talk about their crime in a different way to non-psychopaths 13 of 14 Who found that Canadian psychopaths were 2.5 times more likely to re-offend than non-psychopaths? Oxman et al. (1988) 14 of 14
Comments
No comments have yet been made