Back to quiz

6. What are the derogations under the Cassis de Dijon ruling known as?

  • Mandatory Requirements
  • Quantitative Restriction
  • Selling Arrangements
  • MEQR's

7. Do licensed imports breach Article 34?

  • Yes, Evans Medical & MacFarlan Smith
  • No, Evans Medical & MacFarlan Smith
  • Yes, Commission v France
  • No, Commission v France

8. Which Article lays down various ground which may justify certain restrictions?

  • 37
  • 36
  • 35
  • 34

9. How many exceptions under Article 36 to justify restrictions are there?

  • 7
  • 6
  • 5
  • 8

10. Name the important case associated with MEQR's

  • Walter Rau v De Smedt
  • Cassis de Dijon
  • Dassonville
  • Commission v Italy

11. Article 34 prohibits

  • Certain restrictions maybe justifiable on various grounds, which are not disproportionate
  • Customs on duties and charges do not have equivalent effect
  • Customs on duties and charges having equivalent effect
  • Quantitative restrictions and measures having equivalent effect to quantitative restriction

12. Fill in the blank, 'The free movement of goods is a (blank) conferred within the TFEU

  • Selling Arrangement
  • Fundamental Freedom
  • Applicable Measure
  • Quantitative Restriction

13. Select examples of Quantitative Restrictions (QR)

  • Custom Duties, Taxes and Levy's
  • Bans and Quotas
  • Bans, Quotas and Custom Duties
  • Levy's and Quotas

14. Article 35 prohibits

  • Quantitative restrictions and measures having equivalent effect to quantitative restriction
  • Customs on duties and charges do not have equivalent effect
  • Customs on duties and charges having equivalent effect
  • Certain restrictions maybe justifiable on various grounds, which are not disproportionate

15. Do packaging requirements infringe Article 34?

  • Yes, Walter Rau v De Smedt
  • No, Commission v Italy
  • No, Walter Rau v De Smedt
  • Yes, Commission v Italy

16. Which case produced the definition of 'Goods'?

  • Commission v Italy
  • Commission v Spain
  • Commission v France
  • Commission v Portugal

17. Do government sponsored campaigns to encourage customers to buy domestic products infringe Article 34

  • Yes, Dassonville
  • No, Dassonville
  • Yes, Commission v Ireland
  • No, Commission v Ireland

18. Which case developed the laws surrounding Selling Arrangements?

  • Keck
  • Cassis de Dijon
  • Dassonville
  • Commission v Italy

19. Why was the decision in Cassis de Dijon decided?

  • The ECJ did not have the power to amend Article 36, therefore created alternative derogations MS could plead as an alternative
  • To provide a wider scope to MS
  • To give MS more power when imposing restrictions on products made in other EU MS
  • To narrow the scope available to MS

20. What is a product requirement?

  • Laws regulating the goods themselves which is governed by Article 34
  • Laws concerning not the goods themselves, but rather how, when and where they are marketed
  • Laws concerning distribution of products
  • Laws regulating the quantity of recycled plastic within packaging