Skip to content
Back to quiz
6. What are the derogations under the Cassis de Dijon ruling known as?
- Mandatory Requirements
- Quantitative Restriction
- Selling Arrangements
- MEQR's
7. Do licensed imports breach Article 34?
- Yes, Evans Medical & MacFarlan Smith
- No, Evans Medical & MacFarlan Smith
- Yes, Commission v France
- No, Commission v France
8. Which Article lays down various ground which may justify certain restrictions?
9. How many exceptions under Article 36 to justify restrictions are there?
10. Name the important case associated with MEQR's
- Walter Rau v De Smedt
- Cassis de Dijon
- Dassonville
- Commission v Italy
11. Article 34 prohibits
- Certain restrictions maybe justifiable on various grounds, which are not disproportionate
- Customs on duties and charges do not have equivalent effect
- Customs on duties and charges having equivalent effect
- Quantitative restrictions and measures having equivalent effect to quantitative restriction
12. Fill in the blank, 'The free movement of goods is a (blank) conferred within the TFEU
- Selling Arrangement
- Fundamental Freedom
- Applicable Measure
- Quantitative Restriction
13. Select examples of Quantitative Restrictions (QR)
- Custom Duties, Taxes and Levy's
- Bans and Quotas
- Bans, Quotas and Custom Duties
- Levy's and Quotas
14. Article 35 prohibits
- Quantitative restrictions and measures having equivalent effect to quantitative restriction
- Customs on duties and charges do not have equivalent effect
- Customs on duties and charges having equivalent effect
- Certain restrictions maybe justifiable on various grounds, which are not disproportionate
15. Do packaging requirements infringe Article 34?
- Yes, Walter Rau v De Smedt
- No, Commission v Italy
- No, Walter Rau v De Smedt
- Yes, Commission v Italy
16. Which case produced the definition of 'Goods'?
- Commission v Italy
- Commission v Spain
- Commission v France
- Commission v Portugal
17. Do government sponsored campaigns to encourage customers to buy domestic products infringe Article 34
- Yes, Dassonville
- No, Dassonville
- Yes, Commission v Ireland
- No, Commission v Ireland
18. Which case developed the laws surrounding Selling Arrangements?
- Keck
- Cassis de Dijon
- Dassonville
- Commission v Italy
19. Why was the decision in Cassis de Dijon decided?
- The ECJ did not have the power to amend Article 36, therefore created alternative derogations MS could plead as an alternative
- To provide a wider scope to MS
- To give MS more power when imposing restrictions on products made in other EU MS
- To narrow the scope available to MS
20. What is a product requirement?
- Laws regulating the goods themselves which is governed by Article 34
- Laws concerning not the goods themselves, but rather how, when and where they are marketed
- Laws concerning distribution of products
- Laws regulating the quantity of recycled plastic within packaging