Equity and trusts- the three certainties

HideShow resource information
Wallbank (Certainty of intention:test)
Wife had no right due to wording
1 of 30
Held fathers intention= outright transfer, can't perfect an imperfect gift
2 of 30
No compliance with formalities
3 of 30
Mussorie (Precatory words)
act justly= precatory words. Reflex action all certainties must be satisfied
4 of 30
Adams (Precatory words)
Precatory words not capable of creating trust
5 of 30
Comiskey (Precatory words)
Look at document as a whole
6 of 30
Steele Trust
Words demonstrate intention
7 of 30
Rahman (Fictitious intention)
Fictitious intentions
8 of 30
Paul (Inferred intention)
Intention can be inferred even if a parties do not recognise they are doing so
9 of 30
Don King (Inferred intention)
despite poor wording clear inferred benefit to be held on trust for partnership
10 of 30
Quistclose (Inference from mutual intentions and segregation)
Money was for specific purpose so failed
11 of 30
Yardley (Inference from restriction imposed without segregation)
Limitation due to inferred trust
12 of 30
Kayword (Inference from a unilateral act)
Trust can be inferred when recipient unilaterally acts in a way that reveals the necessary intention to hold the property on trust
13 of 30
Hemmens (COSM)
No trust needed to say where funds came from
14 of 30
Palmer (COSM)
Bulk case. Failed trust similar to Jubber with handsome gratuity
15 of 30
Sprange (COSM)
whatever is left?
16 of 30
Re London Wine co.(COSM, In/tangibles)
No trust as stock was not separated, Tangibles need to be separated
17 of 30
Hunter (COSM, In/tangibles)
Intangible does not need to be seperated
18 of 30
Boyce (COSM, Certainty of beneficial share)
2 houses. Trust failed, method of allocation impossible
19 of 30
Knapton (COSM, Certainty of beneficial share)
Nieces and nephews left house picked in order as listed in will
20 of 30
Waddington (COSM, Certainty of beneficial share)
Furniture, could not have second chance
21 of 30
Re Golay's Will Trust (COSM, Objective Calculus)
Court always being asked what is unreasonable and reasonable. Looked at current situation and came up with sum.
22 of 30
Re Barlow's Will Trust (COO, Conceptual uncertainty)
'Old friends' too vague
23 of 30
Re Wright's Will Trust (COO, Conceptual uncertainty)
Stated to help such institutes and people that helped me. What is help?
24 of 30
Re Baden's Deed Trust (COO, Conceptual uncertainty)
Used relatives and dependants not clear enough
25 of 30
Gold (COO, Conceptual uncertainty)
Listed Carol and kids clear enough
26 of 30
Re Eden (COO, Fixed Trusts: Complete list rule)
Must make up a list
27 of 30
Re Benjamin (COO, Fixed Trusts:Complete list rule)
Fixed trust will not fail because Beneficiary can not be found
28 of 30
McPhail (Discretionary trusts: Class test)
Class test, is it or is not
29 of 30
M' Caig (Capriciousness)
Wanted statue
30 of 30

Other cards in this set

Card 2




Held fathers intention= outright transfer, can't perfect an imperfect gift

Card 3




Preview of the front of card 3

Card 4


Mussorie (Precatory words)


Preview of the front of card 4

Card 5


Adams (Precatory words)


Preview of the front of card 5
View more cards


No comments have yet been made

Similar Law resources:

See all Law resources »See all Equity and trusts resources »