Defences

  • Created by: MARYBETH
  • Created on: 15-01-14 09:20
This defence needs a defect of reason
Insanity
1 of 8
Bratty defined this
Automatism
2 of 8
This defence requires reasonable force
Self Defence
3 of 8
This defence must be true, stated in Tabassum
Consent
4 of 8
This is a defence to crimes of specific intent
Intoxication
5 of 8
This must be cause by an externall factor
Automatism
6 of 8
This case set out the rules of Insanity
McNaghten
7 of 8
This case stated that the ordinary jostlings of life was not battery, in consent
Wilson v Pringle
8 of 8

Other cards in this set

Card 2

Front

Bratty defined this

Back

Automatism

Card 3

Front

This defence requires reasonable force

Back

Preview of the front of card 3

Card 4

Front

This defence must be true, stated in Tabassum

Back

Preview of the front of card 4

Card 5

Front

This is a defence to crimes of specific intent

Back

Preview of the front of card 5
View more cards

Comments

_laurenb

Report

Had the same issue with M'Naghten!

jessie

Report

Couldn't find M'Naghten because it was spelled wrong! Bit of fun though as a little break from normal revision! 

Similar Law resources:

See all Law resources »See all Criminal law resources »