Criminal Liability
0.0 / 5
- Created by: Lisa Allen
- Created on: 07-05-13 21:36
ACTUS REUS
Latin for guilty act. Physical element of the crime. Can be an act, omission or state of affairs. Must be voluntary (Hill v Baxter) except State of Affairs (Larsonneur/Winzar)
1 of 23
OMISSIONS
Failure to act. Not liable unless: 1) Contractual duty (Pittwood) 2) Relationship (Gibbons v Proctor) 3) Volunatarily (Stone v Dobinson) 4) Official Position (Dytham) 5) Dangerous Situation (Miller). Doctors withdrawing treatment not omission (Bland)
2 of 23
CAUSATION
Part of AR. Factual Cause (But for, White), Legal Cause (De minimus, Smith), Thin Skull Rule (Blaue), No intervening acts: Natural unpredictable events, 3rd party (Pagett), V's own act (Roberts/Williams) ,Grossly neg med (Jordan). serious/independent
3 of 23
MENS REA
Guilty mind. Mental element. Each crime has own MR. Statutory offenceswords that indicate MR: "knowingly"/"recklessly". Different levels of MR, highest-intention, lowest-recklessness. Must have at least lowest level of MR
4 of 23
INTENTION
Direct: aim, want, desire (Mohan). Indirect/oblique: virtual certainty, D must realise (Woollin). Recklessness: unjustified risk taking, D must recognise risk (Cunningham), Transferred malice: (Latimer), General malice, no specific V
5 of 23
STRICT LIABILITY
No MR required. Regulatory=Fines. Shah-lotto tick's to 13yr/Alphacell v Woodward-river pollution/Smedleys v Breed-cat'pillar peas. Created by statute, court looks for MR words. Truly criminal, MR presumed (Sweet v Parsley) Protect pub. safety/Quick
6 of 23
CONTEMPORANIETY/COINCIDENCE AR+MR
Don't start at same time but coincide at some point. (Fagan-drove on foot)/(Church-couldn't get it up)
7 of 23
ASSAULT
Common law/Summary offence/6 mnths +/or £5k fine. AR=cause V to fear immediate unlawful personal violence. Words negate assault-Tuberville v Savage. Can be silent phonecalls-Ireland. Logdon-doesn't matter that gun was fake.
8 of 23
ASSAULT 2
Smith v Chief Constable of Woking Police-meaning of immediate was extended, someone looking through woman's window. Constanza-definition of immediate: any time not excluding the immediate future. Mens Rea = Intention/Recklessness as to... Direct/Reck
9 of 23
BATTERY
Common law/Summary offence/6 mnths +/or £5k. AR=application of unlawful force. Slightest touch (Thomas). Can be indirect (DPP v K- acid) (Haystead-dropped baby) Intention as to app. of unlawful forse. Intention/Recklessness
10 of 23
s.47 OAPA 1861 (ABH)
Statutory offence/Either way/Max. 5yrs. AR=assault or battery occassioning ABH. 1) ID assault/battery 2) Causation 3) Miller- harm calculated to interfere with V's health/comfort. T v DPP- loss of consciousness. DPP v Smith- cut hair.
11 of 23
s.47 OAPA 1861 (ABH) 2
Chan-Fook- psychological. Mens Rea = Intention/Recklessness as to assault/battery. No additional MR required (Savage- threw beer glass which slipped out of hand. Intention- aim, want, desire (Mohan) Recklessness- unjustified risk taking (Cunningham)
12 of 23
s.20 OAPA 1861 (GBH or Wounding)
Statutory/either way/max. 5yrs. AR= GBH or Wounding. Eisenhower- wound="breaks both layers of the skin" DPP v Smith-GBH="really serious harm"
13 of 23
s.20 OAPA 1861 (GBH or Wounding) 2
Bollom: consider V- baby covered in bruises. Dica: could be biological (STIs). Burstow: psychological. Mens Rea = Intention or Recklessness as to some harm (Parmenter) Direct-aim,want,desire(Mohan) Reck.- D recognises the risk and takes it (Cunnin')
14 of 23
s.18 OAPA 1861 (GBH/Wounding with intent)
Statutory/Indictable/Max. life. AR=GBH or Wounding. Eisenhower-breaks both layers. DPP v Smith- really serious harm. Bollom, Dica, Burstow. MR=intention only to wound or cause serious harm. Direct/indirect. resist arrest, recklessness (Morrison)
15 of 23
BAIL AND PROCEDURE-summary offences
Sum. Offences: Assault/Battery: If D pleads guilty- Mags pass sentence, likely to be dealt with quickly- Possible adjournment if more info is needed. If D pleads not guilty, matter is adjourned for trial+witness needs to attend. Mags consider bail
16 of 23
BAIL AND PROCEDURE-either way
Plea bef. venue hearin: If D pleads guilty, Mags sentence him. If Mags need higher sentence, send him to Crown Ct.Mode of Trial: When D pleads not guilty, Mags decide whether seriousness of offence+sentencing powers are sufficient
17 of 23
BAIL AND PROCEDURE-either way 2
Consider bail until trial. If Mags accept the case, the D has the right to choose jury trial. Consider bail. Mags = 20% acquittal. Crown = 60% acquittal.
18 of 23
B+P-indictable and Burden+Standard of Proof
Pre-trial procedure. 1st hearing in Mags- decide bail+legal aid. Then sent to Crown Court. (Applies to all). Innocent until proven guilty- burden of proof is on prosecution who must prove D's guilt. Standard of Proof = Beyond all reasonable doubt
19 of 23
SENTENCING types
1) Fines (very common in Magistrates Court) 2) Custodial (over 21's. Under 21's go to Young Offenders) Could be suspended.3) Community (unpaid work/supervision order/curfew/tagged) 4) Discharged (Can be conditional or absolute)
20 of 23
SENTENCING aims
Denunciation: showing disapproval, Rehabilitation: help and support, Retribution: an eye for an eye, Incapacitation: prevented from reoffending, Deterrence: an example to other would-be offenders, Reparation: pay back debt
21 of 23
AGGRAVATING FACTORS
Weapon, group attack, vulnerable victim, planned, prev. conviction, on bail, attack on the grounds of:sex, race, religious, sexual orientaton or disability.
22 of 23
MITIGATING FACTORS
Provoked, first offence, pleaded guilty, showed remorse, D is very old or young
23 of 23
Other cards in this set
Card 2
Front
Failure to act. Not liable unless: 1) Contractual duty (Pittwood) 2) Relationship (Gibbons v Proctor) 3) Volunatarily (Stone v Dobinson) 4) Official Position (Dytham) 5) Dangerous Situation (Miller). Doctors withdrawing treatment not omission (Bland)
Back
OMISSIONS
Card 3
Front
Part of AR. Factual Cause (But for, White), Legal Cause (De minimus, Smith), Thin Skull Rule (Blaue), No intervening acts: Natural unpredictable events, 3rd party (Pagett), V's own act (Roberts/Williams) ,Grossly neg med (Jordan). serious/independent
Back
Card 4
Front
Guilty mind. Mental element. Each crime has own MR. Statutory offenceswords that indicate MR: "knowingly"/"recklessly". Different levels of MR, highest-intention, lowest-recklessness. Must have at least lowest level of MR
Back
Card 5
Front
Direct: aim, want, desire (Mohan). Indirect/oblique: virtual certainty, D must realise (Woollin). Recklessness: unjustified risk taking, D must recognise risk (Cunningham), Transferred malice: (Latimer), General malice, no specific V
Back
Related discussions on The Student Room
- what is double liability ? »
- OCR A-LEVEL LAW - which topics could come up as essay questions? »
- Theft Act 1968 - Criticisms? »
- Regarding a level law »
- AS Level Law paper 1 OCR »
- Choosing a University »
- Help! I'm struggling :( (moot presentation) »
- i need help with my law module problem based question !!! »
- Criminal law postgraduate options »
- Law »
Similar Law resources:
2.5 / 5 based on 3 ratings
5.0 / 5 based on 7 ratings
0.0 / 5
0.0 / 5
0.0 / 5
3.0 / 5 based on 1 rating
4.0 / 5 based on 1 rating
Comments
No comments have yet been made