Back to quiz

6. How can this presumption be rebutted?

  • Where it can be inferred that the parties intended to create legal relations
  • It cannot be

7. If a husband and wife have separated, an agreement between them is likely to be treated as binding. Which case illustrates this point?

  • Simpkins -v- Pays
  • Jones -v- Padavatton
  • Merritt -v- Merritt
  • Balfour -v- Balfour

8. If one party puts himself at a disadvantage as a result of an agreement, this is strong evidence that they think the agreement is legally binding and the other party will find it hard to deny the existence of a contract

  • True
  • False

9. Which case illustrates this point?

  • Jones -v- Padavatton
  • Merritt -v- Merritt
  • Parker -v- Clark
  • Simpkins -v- Pays

10. In which case was the court able to find a situation where an agreement between members of the same household could be binding?

  • Simpkins -v- Pays
  • Balfour -v- Balfour
  • Parker -v- Clark
  • Jones -v- Padavatton

11. Commercial or business agreements are presumed to be legally binding as there is a need for certainty

  • True
  • False

12. One way of rebutting this presumption is where the terms of an advertisement are regarded as being "mere puffs"

  • True
  • False

13. What is another way by which the presumption can be rebutted?

  • Where the agreement contains an "honour clause"
  • If the parties agree that this is to be the case
  • There are no other ways for the presumption to be rebutted

14. Which case illustrates this point?

  • Jones -v- Vernon's Pools
  • Carlill -v- Carbolic Smoke Ball Co Ltd
  • D & C Builders -v- Rees

15. A 'letter of comfort' can be sent to persuade a supplier to sell goods on credit to a subsidiary company - this is not a legally binding promise to guarantee a debt and therefore rebutts the presumption

  • True
  • False