Contract Law Cases 0.0 / 5 ? LawContract LawUniversityNone Created by: deepaCreated on: 18-01-15 14:42 Gibson invitation to treat ("may" be prepared to sell) 1 of 19 Storer all important terms settled = offer 2 of 19 Clarke was unaware of reward = not entitled to it 3 of 19 Gibbons v Procter was unaware of reward but later became aware = entitled to it 4 of 19 Tinn v Hoffman cross offers ≠ contract 5 of 19 Adams v Linsell Postal Rule: offer is accepted once letter is in the post box 6 of 19 Brogden v Metropolitan Railway performance (continuation to supply coal) = acceptance 7 of 19 Hyde v Wrench adding/modifying terms during acceptance = cross offer 8 of 19 Stevenson v McLean request for further information = neither acceptance nor rejection 9 of 19 Butler v Ex-Cell-O in a "battle of forms" - last shot wins 10 of 19 Routledge v Grant no requirement to keep offer open during time stated 11 of 19 Byrne v Van Tienhoven revocation must be communicated before acceptance is sent in post 12 of 19 Dickinson v Dodd communication of revocation through a reliable source is sufficient 13 of 19 Central London Property v High Trees contract was binding despite modification (Promissory Estoppel) 14 of 19 Balfour domestic agreements are unlikely to be legally binding 15 of 19 Edwards commercial agreements are likely to be enforceable in court 16 of 19 Hillas v Arcos contract is not dependent on future arrangements 17 of 19 Scammell v Ousten terms too vague = no contract 18 of 19 Beswick 3rd party is unable to enforce a contract 19 of 19
Comments
No comments have yet been made