Discharge: Performance 0.0 / 5 ? LawContract lawA2/A-levelOCR Created by: em.101Created on: 09-08-17 15:31 Cutter v Powell Performance must be in full 1 of 8 Re: Moore & Landauer Performance must meet the exact terms of the contract 2 of 8 Startup v Macdonald Tender of performance. Claimant had tendered performance within specified time period therefore entitled to damages (oil del. on last day of March). 3 of 8 Scumpter v Hedges Accepting partial performance (PP) In this case, claimant action failed as D hadn't accepted PP (he was left with half a house). 4 of 8 Planche v Colburn Performance prevented by promisee. 5 of 8 Bolton v Mahedeva Substantial performance (central heating; didn't perform) 6 of 8 Hoenig v Isaacs Substantial performance (furnished flat; did perform) 7 of 8 Ritchie v Atkinson Div/ Sev contracts (claimant transported PART of agreed quantity only, not all) 8 of 8
Comments
No comments have yet been made