Skip to content
- Created by: domlpool
- Created on: 30-12-17 03:38
1. a existing contractual duty is not valid consideration
- harley v posonby
- chapell v nestle
- Stilk v myrick
- scotson v pegg
1 of 11
Other questions in this quiz
2. going beyond and existing public duty is valid consideration
- pinnels case
- ward v byhaam
- scottson v pegg
- stilk v myrick
3. Pinnels case
- An existing contractual duty is not valid consideration
- consideration must not be past
- Part payment of a debt is not good consideration for a promise to forgo the balance
- consideration must be sufficient but does not have to be adequate
4. consideration deffinition
- glassbrook bros v glamorgan county council
- lampleigh v braithwait
- currie v misa
- foakes v beer
5. chappell v nestle
- williams v roffey bros
- consideration must be sufficient but need not be adequate
- consideration must move from the promicee
- consideration must not be past
Comments
No comments have yet been made