More cards in this set
Card 6
Front
Performance of an existing contractual duty is insufficient consideration
Back
Card 7
Front
Performance of an existing contractual duty owed to a third party will be sufficient consideration if the promisee obtains the benefit of a direct obligation which he can enforce
Back
Card 8
Front
Consideration must have some economic value
Back
Card 9
Front
Consideration is “some right, interest, profit or benefit accruing to one party or some forbearance, detriment, loss or responsibility given, suffered or undertaken by the other”
Back
Card 10
Front
'Payment of a lesser sum on the day [it is due] in satisfaction of a greater cannot be any satisfaction for the whole . . . The payment and acceptance . . . before the day in satisfaction of the whole would be a good satisfaction . . .'
Back
Card 11
Front
The part-payment of a debt is insufficient consideration
Back
Card 12
Front
Performance of an existing contractual duty may amount to sufficient consideration if the party goes beyond their existing duty
Back
Card 13
Front
Performance of an existing contractual duty may amount to sufficient consideration if the promisor confers a practical benefit or avoids a disbenefit
Back
Card 14
Front
Williams v Roffey is limited to contracts for the provision of goods and / or services and will not apply the part-payment of debt. Hence, part payment of debt is no consideration even if there is a practical benefit.