Coding, Capacity and Duration 0.0 / 5 ? PsychologyPsychology case studiesMemoryCore studiesASAQA Created by: Betsy_2018Created on: 07-01-17 16:51 What did Baddeley investigate? The coding of memory 1 of 18 What did Baddeley find? Of the 4 groups, acoustically similar were worst at ST test and semantically similar were worst at LT test 2 of 18 What did Jacobs investigate? Capacity 3 of 18 What did Jacobs find? Digital span was 9.3 and letter span was 7.3 4 of 18 What did Miller investigate? Capacity 5 of 18 Why did Miller investigate capacity? He noticed that there are 7s in everything; magic 7 6 of 18 Who opposed Miller's suggestions? Cowan; said that chunking was in 4s 7 of 18 What did Peterson and Peterson investigate? ST duration 8 of 18 What did Peterson and Peterson use in their investigation? 24 participants; trigram; 3 digits; retention time of 3-18 seconds 9 of 18 What did Bahrick investigate? LT duration 10 of 18 What did Bahrick find? (48) 70% recognition, 30% recall 11 of 18 Who and how did Shepard support? Bahrick; meaningless photos had lower recall 12 of 18 Why might Peterson and Peterson's results not be useful? They put forgetting down to displacement, but decay is also possible 13 of 18 What is the con of Baddeley's study? The stimuli was meaningless; the word list had no meaning to the participants 14 of 18 What is the con of Jacobs' study? It was conducted a long time ago, can not generalise to today 15 of 18 What was a con of Peterson and Peterson's study? Meaningless stimuli and low mundane realism 16 of 18 What was a strength of Bahrick's study? High external validity due to meaningful memories 17 of 18 What is a con of Bahrick's study? Confounding variables were not controlled 18 of 18
Comments
No comments have yet been made