Back to quiz

6. Who influenced David Hume's thinking?

  • Muller, law of nerve energies
  • Aristotle, with two laws of association
  • I wish I knew the answer but I'm really sorry I do not
  • Kant, prior knowledge on topic

7. Who's students did not agree with vitalism?

  • Strawberry's
  • Banana's
  • Muller's
  • Corner's

8. What is Vitalism?

  • No idea soz
  • It is the life force, it controls bodily mechanism and escapes after death
  • It is our soul that remains even after we die
  • It controls all our movements but leaves our body just before we die

9. How many intuitions are there?

  • 12
  • f**k knows
  • 2
  • 22

10. Causality cannot be proven to exist in the external world, but it is in our understanding, therefore it must be:

  • a forgotten yet present even in the mind
  • really confusing
  • an innate contribution of the mind
  • a learnt contribution of the mind

11. Kant's thinking about the mind =

  • It has rules organised according to space and time
  • Everyone's a Kant LOL
  • It has rules organised according to space but not time
  • It has rules organised according to time not space

12. Does it matter if causation is real or assumed?

  • Yes well not really maybe but then also possibly no okay yes final answer wait
  • Yes, if we can't know causality in nature, logic of science and knowledge = challenged
  • No, if we know causality in science, we can pin point other factors that could be blamed
  • No, it can be either as long as it is justified scientifically

13. Which important physicist had knowledge of Kantian philosophy?

  • Gustav Fletcher
  • Immanuel Kant???
  • Hermann Helmholtz
  • Jacob Jerosky

14. INNER world =

  • 'Featured' world inactive in understanding our world and people around us
  • 'Appearance' world active in creating understanding of external world
  • 'Imagined' world active in creating understanding of internal world
  • wot iz inside us dnt b dirty lol rude

15. What did Hume argue about inductive reasoning (causality)?

  • Blah blah blah no one cares bai
  • It can be justified rationally - this is because of our prior experiences and knowledge
  • It cannot be justified rationally - this belief results from experience of "constant conjunction", not logic
  • It does not matter whether is it an assumption, reverse causality is always correct

16. Why can psychology not be like physics?

  • No spatial dimension, cannot be externally manipulated or mathematically analysed
  • Cos Mr. Mills teaches bad
  • Too much spatial dimension yet no way of manipulating it internally
  • The experiments cannot be proven like they can in physics

17. What did Kant say psychology could never be?

  • His fave subject
  • A RELEVANT science
  • A TRUE science
  • A CORRECT science