Skip to content
Back to quiz
6. Who influenced David Hume's thinking?
- Muller, law of nerve energies
- Aristotle, with two laws of association
- I wish I knew the answer but I'm really sorry I do not
- Kant, prior knowledge on topic
7. Who's students did not agree with vitalism?
- Strawberry's
- Banana's
- Muller's
- Corner's
8. What is Vitalism?
- No idea soz
- It is the life force, it controls bodily mechanism and escapes after death
- It is our soul that remains even after we die
- It controls all our movements but leaves our body just before we die
9. How many intuitions are there?
10. Causality cannot be proven to exist in the external world, but it is in our understanding, therefore it must be:
- a forgotten yet present even in the mind
- really confusing
- an innate contribution of the mind
- a learnt contribution of the mind
11. Kant's thinking about the mind =
- It has rules organised according to space and time
- Everyone's a Kant LOL
- It has rules organised according to space but not time
- It has rules organised according to time not space
12. Does it matter if causation is real or assumed?
- Yes well not really maybe but then also possibly no okay yes final answer wait
- Yes, if we can't know causality in nature, logic of science and knowledge = challenged
- No, if we know causality in science, we can pin point other factors that could be blamed
- No, it can be either as long as it is justified scientifically
13. Which important physicist had knowledge of Kantian philosophy?
- Gustav Fletcher
- Immanuel Kant???
- Hermann Helmholtz
- Jacob Jerosky
14. INNER world =
- 'Featured' world inactive in understanding our world and people around us
- 'Appearance' world active in creating understanding of external world
- 'Imagined' world active in creating understanding of internal world
- wot iz inside us dnt b dirty lol rude
15. What did Hume argue about inductive reasoning (causality)?
- Blah blah blah no one cares bai
- It can be justified rationally - this is because of our prior experiences and knowledge
- It cannot be justified rationally - this belief results from experience of "constant conjunction", not logic
- It does not matter whether is it an assumption, reverse causality is always correct
16. Why can psychology not be like physics?
- No spatial dimension, cannot be externally manipulated or mathematically analysed
- Cos Mr. Mills teaches bad
- Too much spatial dimension yet no way of manipulating it internally
- The experiments cannot be proven like they can in physics
17. What did Kant say psychology could never be?
- His fave subject
- A RELEVANT science
- A TRUE science
- A CORRECT science