R v ______ [1996] Crim LR 35 - act or omission must be "something more than a slight or trifling link"
Back
Card 7
Front
R v ______ (1983) 76 Cr App R - D's conduct must contribute significantly to the result. It need not be the sole cause or even the main cause
Back
Card 8
Front
Novus Actus Interveniens in English is a new _________ act
Back
Card 9
Front
R v Roberts [1971] 56 Cr App R 95 - If the victim responds in a way that a reasonable person could not have predicted, the resulting consequences will not be regarded as reasonably _________ and will be regarded as an independent intervening act.
Back
Card 10
Front
The thin skull principle includes physical weakness as defined in R v ______ (1908) 21 Cox CC 692
Back
Card 11
Front
Thin skull principle also includes mental conditions and beliefs as of R v _____ (1975) 1 WLR 1416
Back
Card 12
Front
Also, the Thin Skull Principle includes neglect or ill treatment by victims of themselves, defined in R v Holland (1841) and R v ____ (1996)
